Solar-Moon eclipse anomaly solution, based on Sola

More
16 years 11 months ago #18209 by Leo Vuyk
Reply from was created by Leo Vuyk
New information about my proposal for a sunspot lensing effect on gravity anomalies measured during solar eclipses.

1: two kinds of gravity around the sun: dark energy or Higgs (push) gravity concentration.

2:Comparison between anomalous gravity variations found by Yang and Wang with the Higgs energy lensing proposal.

SEE:



bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/0...could-influence.html

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 years 11 months ago #20705 by Leo Vuyk
Replied by Leo Vuyk on topic Reply from
But I must admit that the basic idea is:

that gravity is the result of the absorption of Higgs vacuum oscillatory energy (dubbed dark energy) by Fermions, just like the Casimir force.

Consequently gravity is a large scale Casimir force, giving fermions their eigen energy.

Leo.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 years 10 months ago #20452 by MarkVitrone
Replied by MarkVitrone on topic Reply from Mark Vitrone
Leo,

I am going to do some reading and thinking on this, I honestly don't know enough about this angle of thought to make an educated comment, but I'll try to get back to you.
Mark

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 years 10 months ago #18132 by Leo Vuyk
Replied by Leo Vuyk on topic Reply from
Mark,
I apreciate your intention very much, however keep in mind that you have to cross a number of hurdles such as to accept long distance entanglement between observer and observed (anti-)copy "eigen states" of quanta.
Leo.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 years 10 months ago #18348 by tvanflandern
You are behind in your reading of Meta Science. The Allais problem, and specifically the gravity anomaly during eclipses, has already been solved. See "Allais gravity and pendulum effects during solar eclipses explained", T. Van Flandern and X.S. Yang, Phys.Rev.D 67, 022002 (2003). Also available at www.eclipse2006.boun.edu.tr/sss/paper01.pdf -|Tom|-

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 years 10 months ago #20836 by Leo Vuyk
Replied by Leo Vuyk on topic Reply from
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by tvanflandern</i>
<br />You are behind in your reading of Meta Science. Phys.Rev.D 67, 022002 (2003). Also available at www.eclipse2006.boun.edu.tr/sss/paper01.pdf -|Tom|-
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Sorry Tom, I could not get in contact with the pdf. any ideas?

In the meantime I got an idea about the origin of the dual peak shift found in the graph of Kuusela.

I wrote:
For the pencil shaped gravity decrease of T.Kuusela, see page 8/12 of Chris Duif's overview.
arxiv.org/ftp/gr-qc/papers/0408/0408023.pdf

The dual pencil alike gravity decrease are indications , that Tom van Flanderns idea about gravity speed &gt;C is supported by this graph.
Look at the two pencil peaks, tey are shifted to the right!! if we make a comparison with the Wang and Yang graph.
Conclusion, if these two peaks are originated by the alined interference of two sunspots with one lensing object located inside the center of the moon, then the shift of the two peaks are a confirmation and an indication of the real position of the sun at that moment!! Leo Vuyk

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.421 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum