Link: Evidence that the sun has a solid surface

While some of your other posts seem pretty absurd, there is some definite evidence that this theory has some valid points to it. Some of the imagery was amazing. One set in particular reminded me of a close picture of arc welding. I'd be curious to see a good explaination of what really would cause a phenominon to be connected to the sun at both ends of an arch....

It has promise. Furthermore, it might actually aid study of the Meta Model, because it would prove that a lot of things about how gravity is calculated may be totally wrong.

"Regret can only change the future" -Me

There is no way that the surface of the sun could be solid given the sun's surface temperature of about 6000 K (iron has a melting point of about 1800 K). Immediately below the surface the temperature increases even to about 10^7 K , so it is even more impossible here.
Also, I don't see how one can arrive at the conclusion of a rigid rotation just by looking at a few images with poorly defined features. One would need a detailed quantitative 3D- data analysis to show this.

In fact, as I have shown on my own page regarding Coronal Heating , the structure and energetic processes of the sun can in fact be fully explained in terms of a self-gravitating gaseous mass.

---

www.physicsmyths.org.uk
www.plasmaphysics.org.uk

You make good points as well. Could the sun's magnetic field play a role though? Protecting a solid surface by pushing the plasma away, creating some sort of buffer area? It would seem consistent in the regard that electrical arcs can still travel across a vacuum. By no means is this a real theory or anything, just an idea I'm throwing out there...

"Regret can only change the future" -Me

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Dangus</i>
Could the sun's magnetic field play a role though? Protecting a solid surface by pushing the plasma away, creating some sort of buffer area?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
I wouldn' think so. The magnetic field lines of the sun actually cut through its surface, and since the plasma can move freely along the field lines it would get in contact with a solid surface.

---

www.physicsmyths.org.uk
www.plasmaphysics.org.uk

The surface of the sun in the MM would have the most dense layer of LCM. How this layer of density effects the solar mechanism would be interesting. I am curious if the predicted increase in density would allow the LCM to be detectable. Further, it would be most interesting if the data is already collected and just hasn't been interpreted in the context of MM predictions, Mark Vitrone

While I appreciate the comments about iron and magnetism, isn't it commonly supported that iron looses its magnetic properties in temperatures common in blacksmithing forges? While not quoting exact temperatures, this is below 3000 degrees F. The surface of the sun is too hot for iron atoms to align and lock into a magnetic matrix. On the previous post, electric fields and magnetic fields propagating through LCM as electromagnetic waves in general or with some local disruption of waves (a separation of the electric or magnetic fields) could be responsible for localalized super-heating and subsequent vaporization of metals below iron on the periodic table. My question to the panel is: Has any spectroscopy been done on the colors identified in the eruptions? A visit to a university library to the chemical spectroscopy section would easily clarify the exact nature of the metals involved according to the photoelectric effect. Redshift due to the LCM density must be adjusted of course. Let me know what you think, Mark