- Thank you received: 0
Physics versus Mathematics and Logic.
22 years 2 months ago #2788
by Jim
Reply from was created by Jim
Just to understand the current theories are dumb is quite a leap forward from where most scientists are now. Most theory in use today is not mush better than what was available a 1,000 years ago. The belief in nuclear theorys can only be justified by big bombs and a lot of big bucks. The day to day operations of a star are not operating on that dumb logic.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
22 years 2 months ago #2838
by Patrick
Replied by Patrick on topic Reply from P
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=2 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
The question is - can mathematics and logic account for real world physics?
To me the answer is rather no.
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
This is a very interesting subject to me. Take a look at my post
www.metaresearch.org/msgboard/FORUM.asp?FORUM_ID=2 (Creation of the Big Bang!)
I have read several of your posts, you are an extremely intelligent and knowledgeable individual. Let me know what you think.
The question is - can mathematics and logic account for real world physics?
To me the answer is rather no.
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
This is a very interesting subject to me. Take a look at my post
www.metaresearch.org/msgboard/FORUM.asp?FORUM_ID=2 (Creation of the Big Bang!)
I have read several of your posts, you are an extremely intelligent and knowledgeable individual. Let me know what you think.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- AgoraBasta
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
22 years 2 months ago #3219
by AgoraBasta
Replied by AgoraBasta on topic Reply from
Patrick,
The funny thing is that your ideas are in the starkest possible contradiction with my ideas stated above. You try basing a "model" on logic and deducing thereon.
Furthermore, your own logic makes your "nothing" more like "everything", which invalidates you deductions and makes your logic itself internally contradictory. Try patching that - you get a tautology.
But thanks for your kind words, anyway.
The funny thing is that your ideas are in the starkest possible contradiction with my ideas stated above. You try basing a "model" on logic and deducing thereon.
Furthermore, your own logic makes your "nothing" more like "everything", which invalidates you deductions and makes your logic itself internally contradictory. Try patching that - you get a tautology.
But thanks for your kind words, anyway.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
22 years 2 months ago #2902
by Patrick
Replied by Patrick on topic Reply from P
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=2 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
Furthermore, your own logic makes your "nothing" more like "everything", which invalidates you deductions and makes your logic itself internally contradictory. Try patching that - you get a tautology.
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
Wow!, you are exactly right. My case and point from your original post, "everything" from a logical perspective is actually "nothing" in that everything, aside from "nothing" itself, is really just temporary therefore logic eventually won't or can't play a role. By having "something" exist then "nothing" exist but having "nothing" exist doesn't mean that anything else exists. Part of my theory is that "NOTHING" is the only thing that is infinite. The tautology is actually what started me thinking of this idea, that one is simply the same, part of, or reliant upon the other. Which is true with only the exception being "0" or "NOTHING" itself. Your statement is exactly right with the exception of "0" or "NOTHING". Would you be kind enough to give me an example of how you think "0" or "NOTHING" could be a tautology?
Furthermore, your own logic makes your "nothing" more like "everything", which invalidates you deductions and makes your logic itself internally contradictory. Try patching that - you get a tautology.
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
Wow!, you are exactly right. My case and point from your original post, "everything" from a logical perspective is actually "nothing" in that everything, aside from "nothing" itself, is really just temporary therefore logic eventually won't or can't play a role. By having "something" exist then "nothing" exist but having "nothing" exist doesn't mean that anything else exists. Part of my theory is that "NOTHING" is the only thing that is infinite. The tautology is actually what started me thinking of this idea, that one is simply the same, part of, or reliant upon the other. Which is true with only the exception being "0" or "NOTHING" itself. Your statement is exactly right with the exception of "0" or "NOTHING". Would you be kind enough to give me an example of how you think "0" or "NOTHING" could be a tautology?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jimiproton
- Offline
- Premium Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
22 years 2 months ago #2840
by jimiproton
Replied by jimiproton on topic Reply from James Balderston
Quote:
Wow!, you are exactly right. My case and point from your original post, "everything" from a logical perspective is actually "nothing" in that everything, aside from "nothing" itself, is really just temporary therefore logic eventually won't or can't play a role. <Patrick
Patrick,
Your repeated use of the verb "is" leads one to discredit your notion of a "nothing" as replacing everything. Consider "0" as an asymptote, which harmoneously corresponds to the idea of a dimension of scale.
Wow!, you are exactly right. My case and point from your original post, "everything" from a logical perspective is actually "nothing" in that everything, aside from "nothing" itself, is really just temporary therefore logic eventually won't or can't play a role. <Patrick
Patrick,
Your repeated use of the verb "is" leads one to discredit your notion of a "nothing" as replacing everything. Consider "0" as an asymptote, which harmoneously corresponds to the idea of a dimension of scale.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
22 years 2 months ago #2842
by Patrick
Replied by Patrick on topic Reply from P
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=2 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
Your repeated use of the verb "is" leads one to discredit your notion of a "nothing" as replacing everything. Consider "0" as an asymptote, which harmoneously corresponds to the idea of a dimension of scale.
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
Yes, you are correct. I need to stop using the verb in that context.
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=2 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote> Consider "0" as an asymptote, which harmoneously corresponds to the idea of a dimension of scale. <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
Would you please elaborate on this?
Your repeated use of the verb "is" leads one to discredit your notion of a "nothing" as replacing everything. Consider "0" as an asymptote, which harmoneously corresponds to the idea of a dimension of scale.
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
Yes, you are correct. I need to stop using the verb in that context.
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=2 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote> Consider "0" as an asymptote, which harmoneously corresponds to the idea of a dimension of scale. <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
Would you please elaborate on this?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.243 seconds