WHO'S ON MARS? (continued)

More Surface Water On Mars:

These darker areas look like rivulets of water running down hill. The green arrow points to a formation that is typically formed from sediment on the downstream side of a rock.



Viking Image:

Plainly visible in this image is dampish-looking muddy ground (known at NASA as "Cohesive Material".) At the summit of the hill on the top left are a couple of spread out shapes that might be structures. Can anyone identify what the two balls are that can be seen hanging in the sky in the image below?

M2101995 enlarged clip

Anomalous eye with hand. The eye is in profile and appears to have a hand held in front of it. Underneath the eye there is a possible writing string.




extra-enlarged clip below:

Exterester, I have seen your pictures for a long time and I usually do not comment on them because they are a "see the stuff if you can kind of thing". I do question how this line of speculation fits into the scientific method though. Are these pictures evidence of current or past intelligent life on Mars? I find them fascinating from a speculative point of view and I applaud the time and study that you have put into posting them here for us. I however remain unconvinced that these pictures represent artificiality beyond a reasonable doubt. It is my opinion that you should cross reference all of this data onto a map of Mars. Pinpoint the location of these sites and submit them to the scientific community in an organized fashion. Perhaps your work could help plan sites for human or robotic exploration of a nature more sensitive then older photos. Once again thank you personally for the robust contributions. Mark Vitrone

Thank you for the suggestion Mark. At some point I do plan on cross-referencing my work. I wish I could spend all my time on Mars research. I am working unfunded and this limits the time and energy I am able to devote to Mars.

I am not convinced that cross-referencing my work would have value as far as pin-pointing areas for further study. At least I don't think NASA would welcome my "help", not publically anyway. I think their job is to find what is up there and if they discover life do their best to keep it a secret from the rest of us.

I feel we have been misled and continue to be misled about Mars. I find it difficult to trust or depend strictly upon scientific method when it comes to Mars research. I and others have run across many examples of image tamperiing. If they are going to tamper with the images to cover up what is on Mars why would they stop there? I have to assume scientific data might be tampered with as well.

The recent ammonia story is possibly a case in point.

In regards to Mars research I trust what I can see with my own eyes more than I trust officially released scientific data.

And if remote viewing the Mars images or interperting the Mars images has no relevance to the scientific process of discovery of what is on Mars then why bother to have images taken of Mars at all?

Any analysis of the Mars images is somewhat interpretive because we are looking at a photographic representations .

The topic you brought up is an important one and I would like to discuss it further.

Ext, What is the ammonia story?

M0905586

In the image below the white lines that designate the close-up view are partially obliterated by some very dark splotches. Having never seen Martian landscape that climbed up over the close-up lines before I decided to take a closer look at this peculiar anomaly.



The enlarged, curve-adjusted clip below reveals shapes that might be structural in the vicinity of the peculiar dark splotches. This suggests to me that someone was in a hurry blacking out things to sanitize the image and didn't notice that they'd blacked out part of the close-up box too.

If this is image tampering it is ironic that the very act of censoring Mars images offers confirmation that there is more up there than dirt and rocks.