- Thank you received: 0
Large Image File Of Cydonia Mars By ESA
11 years 4 months ago #21691
by Walt
Replied by Walt on topic Reply from
<b>An annular solar eclipse took place on (May 21, 2012 in local time in the Eastern Hemisphere). </b>
<b>Quetzalcoatl is known as the Phoenix or "the morning star" and he was also known by the name
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, "lord of the star of the dawn.
Revelation 2:28
<b>and I will give him the morning star</b>
Done in English Gematria Equals: 228</b>
<b>Work of David Flynn filling in the blanks.</b>
<b>Quetzalcoatl is known as the Phoenix or "the morning star" and he was also known by the name
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, "lord of the star of the dawn.
Revelation 2:28
<b>and I will give him the morning star</b>
Done in English Gematria Equals: 228</b>
<b>Work of David Flynn filling in the blanks.</b>
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
11 years 4 months ago #24271
by Walt
Replied by Walt on topic Reply from
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
11 years 3 months ago #14013
by Walt
Replied by Walt on topic Reply from
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
11 years 3 months ago #14014
by Walt
Replied by Walt on topic Reply from
This is the only way I know how to make the connection. Earth as viewed from Mars. Earth is located at <b>RA1630</b>
Matthew 13:23
But the seed falling on good soil refers to someone who hears the word and understands it. This is the one who
produces a crop, yielding a <b>hundred</b>, <b>sixty</b> or <b>thirty </b>times what was sown. <b>100 60 30 (1630)</b>
<b>(RA1630)</b> where Earth and Jesus is located at his Resurrection from Mars. 4-6-33
Acts 17:18-19
He seems to be a publisher of foreign deities. This was because he was declaring the good news of Jesus and the
Resurrection. 19 So they laid hold of him and led him to the Areopagus <b>(Mars Hill)</b>
Luke 17:37
37 So in response they said to him: Where, Lord? He said to them: Where the body is, there also the eagles will
be gathered together.
Antares or Eagle or Quetzalcoatl or Phoenix thats what rose on 12-21-12 or 333 at 5hrs 21mins 58sec. NASA knows of
<b>1630 5-21-58 </b>and Antares thats why the Mars Rovers software is named Antares. The Antares Pyramid is what they are
praying to in The Congressional Prayer Room.
<b>1630 x pi = 5120.8 and you can get 05-21-58 out of that.</b>
<b>PYRAMID or DIMARYP or Done Mar PI</b>
What they are not telling you about ISON and Mars. ISON will be closest to Mars on 10-1-13, but the closest viewing
angle for us will be on 10-15-13 When both will be with the Heart of the Lion at Hour Angle 16hrs. 30mins. or (1630)
<b></b>
Matthew 13:23
But the seed falling on good soil refers to someone who hears the word and understands it. This is the one who
produces a crop, yielding a <b>hundred</b>, <b>sixty</b> or <b>thirty </b>times what was sown. <b>100 60 30 (1630)</b>
<b>(RA1630)</b> where Earth and Jesus is located at his Resurrection from Mars. 4-6-33
Acts 17:18-19
He seems to be a publisher of foreign deities. This was because he was declaring the good news of Jesus and the
Resurrection. 19 So they laid hold of him and led him to the Areopagus <b>(Mars Hill)</b>
Luke 17:37
37 So in response they said to him: Where, Lord? He said to them: Where the body is, there also the eagles will
be gathered together.
Antares or Eagle or Quetzalcoatl or Phoenix thats what rose on 12-21-12 or 333 at 5hrs 21mins 58sec. NASA knows of
<b>1630 5-21-58 </b>and Antares thats why the Mars Rovers software is named Antares. The Antares Pyramid is what they are
praying to in The Congressional Prayer Room.
<b>1630 x pi = 5120.8 and you can get 05-21-58 out of that.</b>
<b>PYRAMID or DIMARYP or Done Mar PI</b>
What they are not telling you about ISON and Mars. ISON will be closest to Mars on 10-1-13, but the closest viewing
angle for us will be on 10-15-13 When both will be with the Heart of the Lion at Hour Angle 16hrs. 30mins. or (1630)
<b></b>
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Larry Burford
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
11 years 3 months ago #14016
by Larry Burford
Replied by Larry Burford on topic Reply from Larry Burford
OK Walt, last warning.
I can find nothing of scientific interest in your posts. And I'm including speculative science of which I happen to be a fan.
I've asked some of my Christian friends what they think of a sample of your stuff. They pretty much say 'WTF?'.
***
So what is your point?
I'm going to start culling everything you post unless <ul><li>it addresses that last question above</li><li>or the question in the post script below.</li><li>or it is an appeal for leniency</li></ul>LB
PS - I believe it is possible to make a scientific argument for a god or gods. I've never seen one that worked, but perhaps you can succeed where others have failed. Care to try?
I can find nothing of scientific interest in your posts. And I'm including speculative science of which I happen to be a fan.
I've asked some of my Christian friends what they think of a sample of your stuff. They pretty much say 'WTF?'.
***
So what is your point?
I'm going to start culling everything you post unless <ul><li>it addresses that last question above</li><li>or the question in the post script below.</li><li>or it is an appeal for leniency</li></ul>LB
PS - I believe it is possible to make a scientific argument for a god or gods. I've never seen one that worked, but perhaps you can succeed where others have failed. Care to try?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
11 years 1 month ago #21759
by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>
<br />.... They pretty much say 'WTF?'.
***
So what is your point? <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
People write about what they "know" about, in much the same way people see what they know (as demonstrated in the "Superstitious S" Study out of Oxford [PG Schyns et al]) and as seen on countless images on these boards. In some cases they can explain what they know (see) to others, but in many cases they can't. I believe if Walt could have, he would have, but I'm not surprised that he didn't.
As I gaze through some of the images in these topics, I am struck by the fact that "pareidolia" is still not widely understood in the nation and the world. It seems to run rampant, so I would have thought by now more people would know about it.
rd
<br />.... They pretty much say 'WTF?'.
***
So what is your point? <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
People write about what they "know" about, in much the same way people see what they know (as demonstrated in the "Superstitious S" Study out of Oxford [PG Schyns et al]) and as seen on countless images on these boards. In some cases they can explain what they know (see) to others, but in many cases they can't. I believe if Walt could have, he would have, but I'm not surprised that he didn't.
As I gaze through some of the images in these topics, I am struck by the fact that "pareidolia" is still not widely understood in the nation and the world. It seems to run rampant, so I would have thought by now more people would know about it.
rd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.369 seconds