LIFE in our Solar System

Malcolm,

I deleted one of SPs posts then saw another that mentioned Kennedy. To speed things up I did a quick scan for 'Kennedy' on this page. And deleted every post I found with a hit.

I used to save posts I was deleting. But I have not done that for several years. You know the old warning ... always save and back up your work.

[Malcolm] "I never drool, and ..."

Hmmm. I suppose I might be reading more into the way you talk about these 'faces and figurines' than is really there. But you do seem to be quite excited about them.

What about the naked girls? Aren't you interested.? I have not seen any naked boys yet (and I have actually looked), so I am beginning to suspect that the Martians are as sexist as we are.

Or maybe - provocative portrayals of one of the sexes more than the other is not as sexist as we have been led to believe? Two competing theories that make different predictions. Perhaps some actual science can happen here?

Seriously, I'm not trying to trivialize this subject. I'm just telling you what I see in your pictures. Yes, I see some faces. But I also see some attractive naked bodies. They aren't perfect, and not all of them are complete like you might see in a magazine, but they are obviously there.

Don't you see them?

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>
<br />[Malcolm] "I never drool, and ..."

Hmmm. I suppose I might be reading more into the way you talk about these 'faces and figurines' than is really there. But you do seem to be quite excited about them.

What about the naked girls? Aren't you interested.? I have not seen any naked boys yet (and I have actually looked), so I am beginning to suspect that the Martians are as sexist as we are.

Or maybe - provocative portrayals of one of the sexes more than the other is not as sexist as we have been led to believe? Two competing theories that make different predictions. Perhaps some actual science can happen here?

Seriously, I'm not trying to trivialize this subject. I'm just telling you what I see in your pictures. Yes, I see some faces. But I also see some attractive naked bodies. They aren't perfect, and not all of them are complete like you might see in a magazine, but they are obviously there.

Don't you see them?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Larry,

This image was acquired by the MRO on December 28, 2008 at local Mars time 3.39pm along the southwest plains of Melas Chasma centered on latitude -10.403 degrees and 280.200degrees longitude. The range to the target site was 256.4km Further information is available at the HiRISE website at the University of Arizona; hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/ESP_011359_1695

In the lower bottom left hand section of the above image, clearly visible is the apparent specimen of a thin alien entity which appears to be clothed with its left arm raised as if pointing in an easterly direction. The height and scale are difficult to calculate but estimated to be approximately three meters tall.

For further evaluation, the Raw data imagery can be accessed here: hirise-pds.lpl.arizona.edu/PDS/EXTRAS/RD...399/ESP_011359_1695/


[/URL]


[/URL]
Malcolm Scott

I see the figure you are talking about. When you speak of its height, I presume you mean the height of the image itself, rather than the height of the 'tall alien' it is intended to depict? We would of course have no possible way of knowing how tall a tall alien is. This might in fact e a very short alien.

Can you give me the anatomical details you see that suggest it is male.

***

I also see several face images in the same area. One of them is astonishing - almost photographic in detail. Another looks a lot like a gorilla with his thumb in an ear, wiggling his fingers and sticking out a very large tongue. Another appears to be rather skull-like. There are a few more.

Really not too sure on the height of the specimen. This was ascertained using the scale of the location page image. Any help here would be appreciated. In fact, I am of the opinion that the specimen is not actually a living creature. My sense is after looking at many other similar anomalies, that the image could be a hologram projection of some sorts as this seems to be the case elsewhere.

I am very pleased to hear that you can "see" the other facial images which surround the specimen. Larry, you are now on your way in differentiating between pareidolia and the reality of which the Alien presence employs throughout the surface of Mars. This is very important, as I know just how difficult it must be for you in applying scientific principles of understanding, as it must be for all the members of this forum who quantify things using tried and tested epistemology. What we have here on Mars in respect of the Alien presence, actually transcends science as we know it. In fact, as far as I know, there is currently no private or government body (in the public eye) that professes such a study. It is therefore placed into the realm of pseudoscience.

In conclusion of my three year study to date, is that the an Alien presence on Mars is quite substantial inasmuch as their signature is quite evident once the observer accepts the reality and then begins to search with specific criteria in place.

So far, I have concluded there is more than one type of apparent intelligent alien life form there. There appears to be the so-called reptilian model which looks very similar to the human except for facial differences. Also, and this is astonishing, there does seem to be a highly cultured human model seen in many pictographs and pictogram's or holograms. There is also a very strange presence that sprawls the Melas plains and beyond. My analysis of these entities has concluded that they seem to exhibit traits of chromatophores to such an extent, that the entire surfaces of many regions could quite conceivably be a fake image!

I hope that you continue to address this subject in this forum, I feel this is a subject worthy of deep scientific evaluation and the members should address this subject with all speed and not succumb to the typical ridicule. This is up to you and ask if you try and encourage others to bring forth their opinions and thus engage.

I was being facetious regarding the boy comment. I have no idea what the sex is of even if they have a gender profile.

Malcolm Scott

<b>[Malcolm] "In conclusion of my three year study to date, is that the an Alien presence on Mars is quite substantial inasmuch as their signature is quite evident once the observer accepts the reality and then begins to search with specific criteria in place."</b>

<u>Specific criteria</u> for a "quite substantial" alien presence on Mars?
OK

<ul><li>How many alien species have you found on Mars?</li><ul><li> If your investigation is not complete it is reasonable to specify a lower limit only.</li><li> This allows for future discoveries that can increase the total.</li></ul>
<li>For each species, how many individuals are there?</li><ul><li>This goes to the meaning of your 'quite substantial presence' claim</li>
<li> Again, due to incomplete data or unfinished research, it may only be possible to specify lower and/or upper limits rather than actual numbers.</li>
</ul>
<li>Do you have any information about what type of energy they use to power their civilization(s)?</li>
<li>Are they confined to Mars, or have they mastered spaceflight and expanded off-planet?</li></ul>