T or E

Here's Zorba again.





Spidey



and Batman



What are the odds?

Neil

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by neilderosa</i>
<br />Grant
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Neil, now that I finally understand "Grant", WOW that's wild. I was looking at it in reverse. It could be "Lincoln", though.

In the original post, I thought he was looking 45 degrees to our left, but in reality he's looking straight right to our right. This is a good one.



rd

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rderosa</i>
<br />Heck, even jrich admitted he saw Jesus.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Obviously, my sarcasism was too subtle and as well the underlying point I was making. I believe its safe to assume that if I presented as genuine my belief that the image was actually Jesus and rationalized it with some sort of story about Angels decorating the Universe to glorify Him that such a hypothesis would be roundly rejected by you. After all, if Angels were doing the decorating it pretty much obviates the need for some alien civilization to explain the "art". But what argument could you propose to counter my conjecture that didn't damage yours in the process or didn't reduce to what you believe as opposed to what you could prove?

JR

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rderosa</i>
Neil, now that I finally understand "Grant", WOW that's wild. I was looking at it in reverse. It could be "Lincoln", though.

In the original post, I thought he was looking 45 degrees to our left, but in reality he's looking straight right to our right. This is a good one.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">I have to say that I find it astounding that you are seeing "flat art" that strongly resemble familiar figures from history enough to actually name them after such figures, yet at the same time seem convinced that this is more than just pareidolia.

JR

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by jrich</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rderosa</i>
<br />Heck, even jrich admitted he saw Jesus.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Obviously, my sarcasism was too subtle and as well the underlying point I was making. I believe its safe to assume that if I presented as genuine my belief that the image was actually Jesus and rationalized it with some sort of story about Angels decorating the Universe to glorify Him that such a hypothesis would be roundly rejected by you. <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
This could be the funniest thing I've read in 15 years. You don't really think I thought you really thought it was Jesus, do you? Or do you?

rd

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by jrich</i>
<br />I have to say that I find it astounding that you are seeing "flat art" that strongly resemble familiar figures from history enough to actually name them after such figures, yet at the same time seem convinced that this is more than just pareidolia.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
jrich, before I respond to this, can you tell me if you see the image of Grant that is presented in the key? That's an important question. Can you draw us a little sketch of what you think the image is?

rd