My pareidolia knows no bounds.

More
10 years 9 months ago #21935 by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Marsevidence01</i>
<br /> However, by attempting to make the case that I or anyone else is NOT seeing a figure which,Malcolm Scott<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Who is making the case that you or anyone else is NOT seeing a figure? You ARE seeing a figure. I just don't believe that figure is artificial. <blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"> as nothing more than either a rock or, my eyes are NOT seeing what I am seeing due to a brain/eye disorder,Malcolm Scott<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">OK, you're cracking me up now. Nobody said anything about brain/eye disorders. <blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"> To me, simply put, this is not a case of Pariedolia in any form but a case of pure denial.Malcolm Scott<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">To me this is a case of something that we can't see clearly enough to decide. You are happy with it, but I'm not. I say it could easily be a rock. No problem.

I will refrain from commenting on the Rabbit Head.



rd

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 9 months ago #21936 by Marsevidence01

I will refrain from commenting on the Rabbit Head.

rd
[/quote]

Fair enough, we shall agree to disagree. I will hold your views with great regard!

Thank you my friend.

Malcolm Scott

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 9 months ago #21937 by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
By the way Malcolm, the last video didn't see to me to be in 3D as much as the first one. Not sure what to make of it. I mean there was depth from my vantage point to the ground, like I was viewing from a helicopter, but not the deep mountains and valleys of the previous one.

Is that true? I downloaded it like you suggested.

rd

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 9 months ago #21938 by Marsevidence01
Hey Rich, no this video was not produced using stereo files from HiRISE, there are none. I create this suedo 3D file which can give a certain amount of depth and shows better for the human eye. This video is all about the contrived landscape and the ability of the alien mind. However, this is a very interesting image file along the gullys of the Sinus Meridiani. I will post some clipped images later which you will need to "really" zoom right in on to see the detail, what I call "seeing through the blur"

I am however, working on some new 3D images of Hebes Chasma which will be breath taking and will show a new discovery that I beleive will be earth shaking, so stay tuned.

Malcolm Scott

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 9 months ago #21939 by Marsevidence01
Update on the mysterious "rock" gets even deepr. A man in California is sueing NASA for lack of information.

"The refusal to take close up photos from various angles, the refusal to take microscopic images of the specimen, the refusal to release high resolution photos, is inexplicable, recklessly negligent, and bizarre," he writes in the petition.

www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/29/scient...-life_n_4687582.html

I found a more higher resolution .tiff image below. I desaturated the red hue somewhat for a more acurate color and we can see now more details than previous images.

[/URL]

Malcolm Scott

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 9 months ago #21974 by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Marsevidence01</i>
<br />"The refusal to take close up photos from various angles, the refusal to take microscopic images of the specimen, the refusal to release high resolution photos, is inexplicable, recklessly negligent, and bizarre," he writes in the petition.
Malcolm Scott
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Interesting. If true, this is the smoking gun of life on Mars.

I have to caution you though. We've been down this path numerous times before, where there's nowhere to go but a massive conspiracy to hide the facts from the people of the Earth.

But I find it hard to believe in such massive conspiracies. Especially in this day and age of instantaneous transmission of news stories. Someone is bound to spill the beans.

Let's see what comes of the law suit. They can't hide <b>that </b> from us.

One other thing. Why would they hide this from us?

rd

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.416 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum