- Thank you received: 0
My pareidolia knows no bounds.
- Marsevidence01
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
10 years 3 weeks ago #23350
by Marsevidence01
Replied by Marsevidence01 on topic Reply from Malcolm Scott
If I were you, I'd probably do something along the lines of what Neil did in his "Faces in the Chasma" topic, where he laid out his finds systematically, and pretty much said phooey to anyone who didn't think they were artworks. He was flat-out sure they were.
quote: rd
What ever happened to Neil, is he still "engaged" in this subject or.....
Malcolm Scott
quote: rd
What ever happened to Neil, is he still "engaged" in this subject or.....
Malcolm Scott
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
10 years 3 weeks ago #23312
by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Marsevidence01</i>
<br />What ever happened to Neil, is he still "engaged" in this subject or.....
Malcolm Scott
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote"> www.metaresearch.org/msgboard/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1689
rd
<br />What ever happened to Neil, is he still "engaged" in this subject or.....
Malcolm Scott
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote"> www.metaresearch.org/msgboard/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1689
rd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Larry Burford
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
10 years 3 weeks ago #22722
by Larry Burford
Replied by Larry Burford on topic Reply from Larry Burford
Obviously you have not done much homework ...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Marsevidence01
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
10 years 3 weeks ago #22723
by Marsevidence01
Replied by Marsevidence01 on topic Reply from Malcolm Scott
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rderosa</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Marsevidence01</i>
<br />What ever happened to Neil, is he still "engaged" in this subject or.....
Malcolm Scott
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote"> www.metaresearch.org/msgboard/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1689
rd
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
I did not know, I am truly sorry Rich. Please accept my sincere condolences.
Malcolm Scott
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Marsevidence01</i>
<br />What ever happened to Neil, is he still "engaged" in this subject or.....
Malcolm Scott
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote"> www.metaresearch.org/msgboard/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1689
rd
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
I did not know, I am truly sorry Rich. Please accept my sincere condolences.
Malcolm Scott
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
10 years 3 weeks ago #22544
by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
Thanks Malcolm.
I'm mainly thinking: Wow! That was five years ago??
rd
I'm mainly thinking: Wow! That was five years ago??
rd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Larry Burford
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
10 years 3 weeks ago #23313
by Larry Burford
Replied by Larry Burford on topic Reply from Larry Burford
Of course we accept your apology. Since you did not know you should not feel bad. It really is OK.
But also since you did not know, this does reveal that you have done very little research on what has *gone before* at this website.
And that explains parts of your attitude and your responses to our less than back-slapping response to your discoveries. No one has ridiculed you, but you claim we do it frequently.
***
It takes more than a few images and an opinion to catch the attention of people who have seen hundreds of images and heard dozens of opinions over the years.
We really are open to the AOH here.
But you need to realize that a hypothesis is not much more than a guess. And, do you know the difference between a hypothesis (a guess) and a scientific hypothesis (a scientific guess)?
But also since you did not know, this does reveal that you have done very little research on what has *gone before* at this website.
And that explains parts of your attitude and your responses to our less than back-slapping response to your discoveries. No one has ridiculed you, but you claim we do it frequently.
***
It takes more than a few images and an opinion to catch the attention of people who have seen hundreds of images and heard dozens of opinions over the years.
We really are open to the AOH here.
But you need to realize that a hypothesis is not much more than a guess. And, do you know the difference between a hypothesis (a guess) and a scientific hypothesis (a scientific guess)?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.415 seconds