My pareidolia knows no bounds.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>
<br /><b>[rderosa] "Perhaps counseling might help?"</b>

Play nice Rich
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">[]

rd

[/quote]Good luck trying to convince anyone of that. But I'll tell you one thing, I'd love to be a fly on the wall when you tried.

rd
[/quote]

Fly swat anyone? [)]

Malcolm Scott

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>
<br /><b>[Marsevidence01] "Interesting proposal, what makes you think they could have come out of the sky?"</b>

You really don't know what we do here, do you?

Planetary explosions?

The hemispheric dichotomy of Mars?

<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Yep me know's that but could not apply "that to these" particular data points.

I think you may agree if you were to take the time to inspect these points WITH 3D red/cyan glasses which I now know you are <i>not</i> using and are assuming here. I keep asking you Larry to get a pair and then you may "catch" something which......"I am doing here"

Malcolm Scott

[/quote]I have to agree this area is compelling. One can easily imagine how these might be ancient ruins. Perhaps some kind of fortress or "city".

Only problem is "perhaps" just don't get us there.

rd
[/quote]

It is tempting to "jump" at a conclusion that these "structures" look like ancient ruins. That would be a Human assumption and an understandable one.
However, if you take the time to slow your eyes down and pinpoint your vision, and then very slowly move across the structures, you might see something that is inconsistent with a "ruin". But what software are you using to view here.....? This might be the cause of your identity woes?

An assumption is being made here me thinks....

Anyway, I do not know what they are but I do know what they are not, they are not cliffs at least not in the strict sense of the geological description on Earth.

Malcolm Scott

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>
<br /><b>[rderosa] "Perhaps counseling might help?"</b>

Play nice Rich
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

No worries here Larry...Rich is a being funny....let him play.

Malcolm Scott

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Marsevidence01</i>
<br />It is tempting to "jump" at a conclusion that these "structures" look like ancient ruins. That would be a Human assumption and an understandable one.
Malcolm Scott
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">I'm usually pretty careful how I phrase these comments. What I actually said was:

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><b>One can easily imagine how these might be...rd </b><hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Subtle difference. See, in what I DID say, there's an underlying unspoken comment, as in: <b><i>I don't think they are, but one can easily imagine how these MIGHT be...</i></b>

I was giving you about 10% to 20% of a compliment.

rd