My pareidolia knows no bounds.

Thanks rd. Very helpful to me, and appreciated, as I have trouble following directions. I hate to go off the major highways for the same reason - towns with poor signage are my pet peeve.

Larry, if you have any influence, if we could get my whole green suggestion box imaged, we could wrap this thing up right here.

rd

Since I'm not an astronomer I do not have any influence. You've made some progress where I would not even know where/how to begin.

LB

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rderosa</i>
<br /> ...we could wrap this thing up right here.

rd
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
On second thought, I take that back. I don't think it's going to matter that much one way or the other. I've been looking at the only two HiRise image strips in the area, and I realized that in order to see the Nefertiti Image (assuming they imaged my suggestion), one would have to view in HiView at roughly 8 to 10% of the full resolution, because the image is huge. So that's one problem right there because we're right back where we started from. Plus, if you zoom in at 100% it would be like walking up to a Rembrandt and putting your eyes about 1cm from the canvas. What kind of conclusions could you possibly draw?

rd

<b>[rderosa] "What kind of conclusions could you possibly draw?"</b>

What happens when you stand next to one of the Nazca Lines and look at it? Anyone know, first or second hand? (Please say which.)

I imagine you *might* still get an impression of artificiality. For Nazca. (But for Nefertiti? Boots on the ground, dude. Or tires.)

Seems like I remember seeing a documentary on the Nazca Lines once, where they said the lines were mostly recognized as man-made, based on an up-close inspection, for a long time before anyone we know of saw them from the air.

***

I wonder how erosion here compares to erosion there?

LB