Gravity and red shift?

The Hubble redshift is a result of gravity in my opinion rather than recessional velocity as is generally assumed. This is an idea I'm working on and nothing more than that. But, it would still be much better to scale the Hubble Constant to SI units as this would alter the way math is done in BB theory. The use of "H" in calculating the parameters of the universe would not be useful if SI scale was used.

Another angle proposed by Arp on this subject is the relationship between redshifted light and the creation of zero-mass new matter, which, in due time, acquires mass. Thus 'young' objects, including many quasars, display an intrinsic redshift based on their immature matter mass. As the objects mature, their measured redshift reduces - the logical deduction being that distant objects display huge redshift values because we are observing them as young objects, not because they are receding at near-c speeds.

This assumption seems to have come about for the abundant evidence of matter ejection from AGN's and seyferts.

Gordon,

Moessbauer made his famous experiment in the late sixties which proves the light redshift due to Earth gravitational field. The accuracy of the experiment is impressive.