- Thank you received: 0
How absolute are our measuring units?
21 years 5 months ago #6149
by north
Reply from was created by north
heusdens
you seem to use math to observe,while what you should really be doing is using math to refine the observations,otherwise you will distort the observations.
you seem to use math to observe,while what you should really be doing is using math to refine the observations,otherwise you will distort the observations.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- riff-raff-alunas
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
21 years 4 months ago #6235
by riff-raff-alunas
Replied by riff-raff-alunas on topic Reply from victoras nerkeliunas
<b>AH HA!</b>
consider the newly released data(july 9th, 2003) on a 13 billion year old globular cluster, in which exists a binary star system with a JupiterX2 sized 'planet'...all this is mathematically generated via present cosmological models and visuals provided by HUBBLE...
hence, our present measuring standard units- - must be rectified to
fit the physics model...OR vice-versa...say wot?
any input is appreciated.
Might someone infer? that the very early physical universe- during
the 'Inflationary' period (prior to Expansion, which is active today)
both the Evolutionary, upward--and the Entropy, downward/decay Models
were independent of TIME, laws of physics, mathematics, etc.??
almost a quantum universe, where 'old' 'aged' 'evolved' were almost
instantly present?
dare we ammend the simple-to-complex model
in which everything that is, progressed/evolved over time to form
our measurable univ. in the 'one direction time flow model'?
thanx for the thread lead in, ya'll
enjoy the journey
consider the newly released data(july 9th, 2003) on a 13 billion year old globular cluster, in which exists a binary star system with a JupiterX2 sized 'planet'...all this is mathematically generated via present cosmological models and visuals provided by HUBBLE...
hence, our present measuring standard units- - must be rectified to
fit the physics model...OR vice-versa...say wot?
any input is appreciated.
Might someone infer? that the very early physical universe- during
the 'Inflationary' period (prior to Expansion, which is active today)
both the Evolutionary, upward--and the Entropy, downward/decay Models
were independent of TIME, laws of physics, mathematics, etc.??
almost a quantum universe, where 'old' 'aged' 'evolved' were almost
instantly present?
dare we ammend the simple-to-complex model
in which everything that is, progressed/evolved over time to form
our measurable univ. in the 'one direction time flow model'?
thanx for the thread lead in, ya'll
enjoy the journey
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
21 years 4 months ago #5997
by Jim
Replied by Jim on topic Reply from
You need to believe in the models to believe the stuff they generate is real. How due you know the star cluster you say NASA found is 13bya? And now NASA has found a planet that old too-How?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.436 seconds