string theory - complete nonsense?

More
19 years 10 months ago #11931 by mhelland
Replied by mhelland on topic Reply from Mike Helland
That position really misses the point of dimensions.

Pun ony slightly intended. What you're talking about is an extremely naive idea about dimensions.

mhelland@techmocracy.net

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
19 years 10 months ago #11933 by north
Replied by north on topic Reply from

messiah

but, what do you mean by emanating from the 0,0,0 nucleus?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
19 years 10 months ago #11937 by Jim
Replied by Jim on topic Reply from
The 3D universe as seen in the xyz system has to have two zero points; one zero is absolute zero and the other is relative zero. The two zero effect is like a magic trick and anyone getting into this should be aware of the problem. The absolute zero leads to three dimensions but the relative zero has six dimensions and many mirror images because it is placed at any convenent point in the universe.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
19 years 10 months ago #11941 by cosmicsurfer
Replied by cosmicsurfer on topic Reply from John Rickey
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Messiah</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by wisp</i>
<br />emanuel

........

Myself, I just believe in 3-dimensions of space and a separate time dimension. I can’t see how the universe can have more than 3-dimensions of space.



wisp

- particles of nothingness
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

In reality there are an infinite number of <b><i>dimensions</i></b>. We just use 3 axes to describe them in terms of XYZ. There are an endless number of <b><i>directions</i></b> emanating from the 0,0,0 nucleus and a positive coordinate for every negative one.

If someone finds a direction which I have not seen, please advise me at once for I would certainly like to explore it.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

I would have to agree that the Universe at least this one that we live in has a positive and negative time lobe and is flat with rotation. Here is an interesting research article that I just found on this subject. I will annotate the research with my own interpretations:

<b>Dark Matter, Antimatter and Time-Symmetry</b>

"If space, time and mass-energy expand outward from the <i>[hyperdimensional plasma ejecta]</i> Big Bang along the time axis equally in the (+) and (-) directions, then time is symmetric by Weyl's definition. In the Feynman-Stueckelberg Interpretation, antimatter is identical to matter but moves backward in time. This paper argues this interpretation is physically real, leading to the universe containing dark matter <i>[dark matter actually is sister Antimatter Universe]</i> with mass accumulations similar to ordinary matter. As time expands, in both directions away from the origin, quantum uncertainty allows a brief, decreasing leakage of mass between (+) and (-) universes <i>[polarized plasma ejecta split into two opposing Matter and Antimatter rotational fields giving birth from higher dimensional source Universe].</i> Matter leaking from (-) to (+) time moves forward in time, producing preponderance of matter in (+) time. Antimatter leakage from (+) time to (-) time in the same way produces antimatter preponderance in the (-) time universe. The remaining opposite partner particles left by the leakage, (antimatter and matter respectively) proceeding outward in antitime and time respectively, after many annihilations also increase the two preponderances in the two universes. The anti-universe should be observable by gravitational lensing, predicting "MACHOS" of approximately stellar mass, and multiple micro-lensing of quasars. Non-existence of primordial antimatter of Z&gt;1, and a large variation in the quantities of dark matter associated with different individual galaxies are predicted. A symmetry is provided for Nodland and Ralston's observed maximum axis of rotation of polarization of galactic synchrotron radiation. A new solution of the horizon problem at times close to the origin is indicated. Collapse of the wave function and time's arrow are explained and non-locality and instantaneity of quantum interaction required. Extension of the hypothesis to six dimensions gives an 83.3% dark matter share of the universe."

arxiv.org/abs/physics/9812021

So, supposedly dark matter is the missing puzzle that fixes the gravitational problems associated with Galactic Rotation and is the repulsive force that fixes problem with increasing expansion after the Big Bang which I believe never happened. However, if our flat Universe is rotational and forms huge galactic storms that generate Antimatter Jets within the centers and we are simply the other side of a total revolutional spinning dynamic called an Antimatter Universe that has a reverse spin and reverse time direction to our own Universe, then this would fix all of the problems with expansion that has galaxies at the furthest reaches of our visible universe traveling away from us at the speed of light. Which is improbable to say the least since most likely the curvature of light around our flat spinning Matter half of Universe is deceptively registering false redshifts due to curvature next to electromagnetic fields.

Yes, there would be an infinite potential for dimensions, and we are just a cascade dynamic from a higher dimension.

John

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
19 years 10 months ago #11942 by Jim
Replied by Jim on topic Reply from
Adding + and - to the xyz graph results in eight images where one image was in the original graph. How does that resolve the rotional problem that exists in theories about galaxies by generation of dark matter? If you do the math right there isn't a rotional problem in my opinion. The disk has mass not centered but assembled throughout the structure so the gravity of the disk is not centered either.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
19 years 10 months ago #12014 by rebrady
Replied by rebrady on topic Reply from Robert Brady
It is possible that strings are there. Some kind of energy is.

I built a Big Bang Simulator which, as it turns out, points toward many of the ideas of Le Sage. Of note, the experiment supports the idea that:
“Random matter in a random energy field will self organize.”

The simulator shows that all the attributes of gravity are naturally created.

It also suggests that a phase for the universe after expansion could occur whereby all matter disassociates because of the loss of gravity.

I have placed a setup file and a paper on my website at www.eskimo.com/~rebrady/bbang.msi
If you have any trouble downloading the file or opening it, please let me know. Also I would like your comments if you have any.

Robert E. Brady
Sammamish, Washington


<font face="Arial"></font id="Arial">[8D]<div align="left"></div id="left">

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.443 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum