- Thank you received: 0
Neutron Stars
19 years 6 months ago #13472
by JMB
Reply from Jacques Moret-Bailly was created by JMB
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by north</i>
<br />
are these Stars a plausable concept? if so why? because neutronium seems at this point to be a SF concept.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Well known properties of the matter, the reliable theory of the stars lead to the concept of neutron stars.
It is clear that it is difficult to know what happens inside these stars, but, their general properties are well known.
These stars are observed in the steps of their evolution found from the theory, except the step "accretor" (accreting neutron star) because when this step is observed, it is named "quasar".
<br />
are these Stars a plausable concept? if so why? because neutronium seems at this point to be a SF concept.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Well known properties of the matter, the reliable theory of the stars lead to the concept of neutron stars.
It is clear that it is difficult to know what happens inside these stars, but, their general properties are well known.
These stars are observed in the steps of their evolution found from the theory, except the step "accretor" (accreting neutron star) because when this step is observed, it is named "quasar".
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 years 6 months ago #13248
by Jim
Replied by Jim on topic Reply from
These stars and other objects in the same field can exist just as Superman can exist. The models make these objects not the universe. Why would nature or god make silly things like that?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.278 seconds