- Thank you received: 0
Creation of the Big Bang!
22 years 3 weeks ago #3207
by makis
Replied by makis on topic Reply from
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=2 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
The theory would state that “ZERO”(pure existence) is the only thing that is truly infinite because everything else that exists is dependant on something else for its existence. (ie. Time is dependant on space)
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
Don't look any further than the obvious:
X/infinity = 0
What does this really mean? If we take the entity X and we divide it infinite times we get 0. So what happened to X in the first place? Isn't there? Of course, it is! How?
0*infinity = X, But X can be anything in the Universe, including out original X.
or,
0*infinity = everything (X)
If we think in input-output terms, 0 is the transfer function, or in fancy terms, the OPERATOR, than transforms infinity into everything. For the Universe to exist, both 0 and infinity are required. A finite universe will not be passible, in this context (0*finite=0)
In this context, ZERO is the primary mechanism for existence. Infinity is the input. Physical reality is the output.
But ZERO and INFINITE is not the same thing.
The theory would state that “ZERO”(pure existence) is the only thing that is truly infinite because everything else that exists is dependant on something else for its existence. (ie. Time is dependant on space)
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
Don't look any further than the obvious:
X/infinity = 0
What does this really mean? If we take the entity X and we divide it infinite times we get 0. So what happened to X in the first place? Isn't there? Of course, it is! How?
0*infinity = X, But X can be anything in the Universe, including out original X.
or,
0*infinity = everything (X)
If we think in input-output terms, 0 is the transfer function, or in fancy terms, the OPERATOR, than transforms infinity into everything. For the Universe to exist, both 0 and infinity are required. A finite universe will not be passible, in this context (0*finite=0)
In this context, ZERO is the primary mechanism for existence. Infinity is the input. Physical reality is the output.
But ZERO and INFINITE is not the same thing.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
22 years 3 weeks ago #3208
by Atko
Replied by Atko on topic Reply from Paul Atkinson
I really hate to get sucked into this again, but the maths doesn't apply, to summarise something I posted elsewhere re infinity in arithmetic -
if x/inf = 0 and we add 1 to both sides
x/inf + 1 = 1
then multiply both sides by infinity
x + inf = inf
which, subtracting infinity from both sides leads us to
x = 0
Basically infinity doesn't exist in mathematics, so no mathematical argument is applicable where you use it as a constant or a variable.
You guys are just going to go around in circles until this thread overloads the server.
if x/inf = 0 and we add 1 to both sides
x/inf + 1 = 1
then multiply both sides by infinity
x + inf = inf
which, subtracting infinity from both sides leads us to
x = 0
Basically infinity doesn't exist in mathematics, so no mathematical argument is applicable where you use it as a constant or a variable.
You guys are just going to go around in circles until this thread overloads the server.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
22 years 3 weeks ago #3209
by makis
Replied by makis on topic Reply from
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=2 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
(x/inf) + 1 = 1
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
This operation is invalid. The reason is that left hand is equivalent to:
(x+inf)/inf
which is an undetermined operation, inf/inf
Furthemore,
in inf+x=inf, subtracting inf from both sides is another invalid operation. You cannot subtract infinity from infinity Atko. You can neither divide inf by inf or 0 by 0.
(x/inf) + 1 = 1
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
This operation is invalid. The reason is that left hand is equivalent to:
(x+inf)/inf
which is an undetermined operation, inf/inf
Furthemore,
in inf+x=inf, subtracting inf from both sides is another invalid operation. You cannot subtract infinity from infinity Atko. You can neither divide inf by inf or 0 by 0.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
22 years 3 weeks ago #3425
by Atko
Replied by Atko on topic Reply from Paul Atkinson
Makis
<b><u>EXACTLY</u></b>. This is the point I've been trying to hammer home (and I swear I'll give up after this post) throughout this and other threads related to this Zero/Infinity shenanigans. But it's not simply a case of the instances you reference - you can't use infinity in <b><i>any</i></b> computation - x/infinity is just as meaningless as inf/0, o/inf etc etc.
Infinity only has application as a limit, and even then it doesn't tell you anything concrete beyond that there is no limit. Maths simply doesn't apply to this thread; trying to reference it as a proof is sheer pseudo-science of the worst kind.
<b><u>EXACTLY</u></b>. This is the point I've been trying to hammer home (and I swear I'll give up after this post) throughout this and other threads related to this Zero/Infinity shenanigans. But it's not simply a case of the instances you reference - you can't use infinity in <b><i>any</i></b> computation - x/infinity is just as meaningless as inf/0, o/inf etc etc.
Infinity only has application as a limit, and even then it doesn't tell you anything concrete beyond that there is no limit. Maths simply doesn't apply to this thread; trying to reference it as a proof is sheer pseudo-science of the worst kind.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
22 years 3 weeks ago #3211
by Atko
Replied by Atko on topic Reply from Paul Atkinson
Okay, why should I spoil your fun by injecting reality? (and if anyone says, "But what is reality?" I'll sign 'em up for a lifetime subscription to The National Enquirer).
Just try not to use arithmetic which employs zero and infinity as accepted by everyone else on the planet, when you have redefined them to suit yourself for the purposes of this interminable discussion.
-sound of gentle sigh from Atko as he slashes his wrists-
<img src=icon_smile_dead.gif border=0 align=middle>
Just try not to use arithmetic which employs zero and infinity as accepted by everyone else on the planet, when you have redefined them to suit yourself for the purposes of this interminable discussion.
-sound of gentle sigh from Atko as he slashes his wrists-
<img src=icon_smile_dead.gif border=0 align=middle>
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
22 years 3 weeks ago #3212
by Atko
Replied by Atko on topic Reply from Paul Atkinson
Sorry, just before I expire, isn't it down to YOU to prove
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=2 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote> the entity described as "ZERO" in this thread is still the purest form of existence. Please try to disprove that.
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
???
Okay - I'm really going this time...
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=2 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote> the entity described as "ZERO" in this thread is still the purest form of existence. Please try to disprove that.
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
???
Okay - I'm really going this time...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.226 seconds