I agree with Tom Van Flandern. Be ready to receive harsh comments, insults...
Your work is very useful, although the best arguments do not work.
The observation of the quasars (variation of their intensities) shows that they are small objects.
In addition to Arp's arguments, there are:
- Kotov observed that the brightness of the stars have a periodicity of 160 minutes which is not subject to the expansion of the Universe...
- The objects observed close to the quasars have anomalous redshifts
- To explain observations which deny the value of the BB, a lot of patches are put on usual physics: variation of the fine structure constant, existence of dark matter, new generation of isotopes...
A problem is that, for a long time, an optical effect named ISRS was unknown of the astrophysicists although it was observed for the first time in 1968. This effect increases, by frequency shifts, the entropy of a set of electromagnetic beams simultaneously refracted by a convenient matter, without any perturbation of the wave surfaces and any blurring of the spectra. Therefore, usually, light is redshifted and radio waves are blueshifted (in particular, the thermal radiation is heated). This effect is easily observed in the labs using femtosecond laser pulses, but it is (roughly) inversely proportional to the cube of the length of the pulses. As ordinary light is made of nanosecond pulses, the intensity of the effect is divided by a big factor (10^15), so that astronomical paths are required. The ISRS effect using ordinary light is renamed, to avoid confusions: CREIL. It explains completely the spectra of the quasars, the periodicities of the high redshifts, the proximity effect (the objects observed close to the quasars have often "anomalous" redshifts), the "anomalous acceleration" of the Pioneer 10 and 11 probes, the bounding of the CMB to the ecliptic ...
