BB wrong again....and again ....and again.

What about E. The universe and its galaxies were recently created.

Of course, the BB gestapo won't come up with that option, but it is another "model" that should be considered.

Romans 1:25 "They exchanged the truth of God for a lie..."

In this place (unlike many mainstrean boards) option E will be considered. Actually, any evidence you have to support it will be considered.

No evidence means the option won't go very far.

Citations from a certain kook journal won't go very far either.

Food for thought,
LB

What the Big Bang gestepo will say - I'm not sure, but maybe 'A' is right.

An infinitely old universe with lots of 'mini bangs' might be a good compromise. The mini bangs might happen on the scale of superclusters. The mechanism for the 'bangs' being a reduction in the value of 'G' for regions of matter of high mass/radius ratio.

So for a supercluster collapsing under its own gravity, (leading to high temperature and pressure), if G then reduces, the bang would result.

This conclusion has been reached by considering a straightforward conjecture described in www.gravity.uk.com . The same conjecture gives a natural solution of the flatness problem.

It is discussed to some extent in another thread under the 'galaxies heading'.

John Hunter.