- Thank you received: 0
Pushing Gravity
- rousejohnny
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
18 years 5 months ago #15311
by rousejohnny
Reply from Johnny Rouse was created by rousejohnny
OOOPS, wrong forum....sorry.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tvanflandern
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
18 years 5 months ago #15961
by tvanflandern
Replied by tvanflandern on topic Reply from Tom Van Flandern
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rousejohnny</i>
<br />I was wondering if pushing gravity could be a hydrodynamic effect where mass displaces x (the pusher) and x is trying to fill in the void?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">That seems to replace a single force (gravitons pushing on mass) with two new unexplained forces. What causes the hydrodynamic force that pushes x? What force enables x to push back? And why wouldn't these two forces cancel, leaving everything as it was?
Remember, in a vacuum, fluids do not stay together but simply dissipate. If a hole appears in a fluid, there is no tendency to fill it in unless something like gravity is already present. So, like the much-heralded rubber sheet analogy, this hydrodynamic idea seems to require pre-existing gravity to enable it to be an explanation for gravity. -|Tom|-
<br />I was wondering if pushing gravity could be a hydrodynamic effect where mass displaces x (the pusher) and x is trying to fill in the void?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">That seems to replace a single force (gravitons pushing on mass) with two new unexplained forces. What causes the hydrodynamic force that pushes x? What force enables x to push back? And why wouldn't these two forces cancel, leaving everything as it was?
Remember, in a vacuum, fluids do not stay together but simply dissipate. If a hole appears in a fluid, there is no tendency to fill it in unless something like gravity is already present. So, like the much-heralded rubber sheet analogy, this hydrodynamic idea seems to require pre-existing gravity to enable it to be an explanation for gravity. -|Tom|-
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rousejohnny
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
18 years 5 months ago #15835
by rousejohnny
Replied by rousejohnny on topic Reply from Johnny Rouse
I understand, I was extremely unclear (as usual). The x would be some form of some sort of elysium that is infinate, but in a fixed volume. The mass displaces the elysium which then attempts to fill in the void generated by the mass.
The problem is why the well never fills? Now, here is a truely wild speculation..... Mass absorbs it and this is where the particles get there mass....this is the "higgs".
There is a GUT.
The problem is why the well never fills? Now, here is a truely wild speculation..... Mass absorbs it and this is where the particles get there mass....this is the "higgs".
There is a GUT.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.413 seconds