How, John S. Bell preferred to teach special relat

More
16 years 9 months ago #15267 by Leo Vuyk
Replied by Leo Vuyk on topic Reply from
quote/One of those premises means that there is no such thing as remote simultaneity between frames. -|Tom|-/unquote

Not in SR but perhaps in reality?
That is why I started this whole discussion on lightspeed anomalies found by Babcock and Bergman and Shapiro and Earth-FlyBy anomalies desrcibed at:


bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/0...dent-lightspeed.html
the ellipsoidal shaped LASOF (local A-symmetrical oscillating vacuum frame) frame seems to influence the lightspeed around the earth in a complex way.
bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/0...could-influence.html
However, there is also reason to assume that the same LASOF is equipped with extra gravity drag, which could be the origin of the so called Fly By Slingshot anomaly.
The FlyBy slingshot anomaly is the UNEXPECTED EXTRA push which is given to spacecrafts passing the Earth.
n the next article is made clear, that the gravitational asymmetry is oriented in the
direction of the Earths motion within an assumed unique reference frame (just like the LASOF ellipsoid?)
see:
H. J. Busack
17. November 2007
arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0711/0711.2781.pdf

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 years 9 months ago #19854 by tvanflandern
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Leo Vuyk</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">[tvf]: [In SR], there is no such thing as remote simultaneity between frames.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Not in SR but perhaps in reality?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">That is not at issue. SR was falsified in favor of LR in:
Experimental Repeal of the Speed Limit for Gravitational, Electrodynamic, and Quantum Field Interactions, T. Van Flandern and J.P. Vigier, Found.Phys. 32:1031-1068 (2002).

But you have continued to discuss the physics of SR, which I assumed was for historical reasons, as seems the case in some of your other posts too. As you surely know, in Meta Science, there are no black holes, dark matter, dark energy, time dilation, or space contraction. The Pioneer anomaly and the Allais effect have simple, prosaic explanations. Gravity has five new properties beyond those recognized by GR. And the major paradoxes of QM are resolved by the repeal of the universal speed limit. -|Tom|-

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 years 9 months ago #20525 by Leo Vuyk
Replied by Leo Vuyk on topic Reply from
Thank you Tom , but I new we had a different view on reality before.
There are tons of reasons to change black holes, and make logic based changes in mainstream physics.
However I think there could be also an other way to look at reality, such as a different Fermion repelling masslass Black hole.


Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.277 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum