- Thank you received: 0
Replication Theory:: Fractal Resonance
15 years 5 months ago #23691
by Stoat
Replied by Stoat on topic Reply from Robert Turner
Let's see if we can get into the ball park with some rough figures. Start with the capacitance of a sphere of the Compton wavelength. C = 4pi*epsilon*r (1/4pi*epsllon = about 9E 9)
C = about 2.4E-12/9E 9
The tank circuit has f = 1/2pi*sqrt(LC) We can say that the resonant frequency is the frequency of the electron and work out what the inductance is.
I haven't done it yet but I suspect we are going to end up with another reciprocal value in there someplace.
C = about 2.4E-12/9E 9
The tank circuit has f = 1/2pi*sqrt(LC) We can say that the resonant frequency is the frequency of the electron and work out what the inductance is.
I haven't done it yet but I suspect we are going to end up with another reciprocal value in there someplace.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
15 years 4 months ago #22895
by evolivid
Replied by evolivid on topic Reply from Mark Baker
Hey Stoat thanxs for your post!
* The magnitude of the electrical charge of one mole of electrons (approximately 6.022 1023 electrons, or Avogadro's number) is known as a faraday. One faraday equals 96485.3399 coulombs (the Faraday constant).
* one ampere-hour = 3600 C
* The elementary charge is 1.602176487 10^19 C
so with a more precise view we look at the Farad
F = A*s/V = J/V^2 = C/V = C^2/N*m = s^2*C^2/m^2*kg = s^4*A^2/m^2*kg
with C = coulomb
MARX
* The magnitude of the electrical charge of one mole of electrons (approximately 6.022 1023 electrons, or Avogadro's number) is known as a faraday. One faraday equals 96485.3399 coulombs (the Faraday constant).
* one ampere-hour = 3600 C
* The elementary charge is 1.602176487 10^19 C
so with a more precise view we look at the Farad
F = A*s/V = J/V^2 = C/V = C^2/N*m = s^2*C^2/m^2*kg = s^4*A^2/m^2*kg
with C = coulomb
MARX
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
15 years 4 months ago #22896
by evolivid
Replied by evolivid on topic Reply from Mark Baker
If im not mistaken Stoat then the inductance Surface area inside the electron should be linked to
its reduced mass in the center or radius A * radius B(radiusA + radius ^-1
= 1.84944971145e-23 = mass of inductance of magnetic field
inside the electron
MARX
its reduced mass in the center or radius A * radius B(radiusA + radius ^-1
= 1.84944971145e-23 = mass of inductance of magnetic field
inside the electron
MARX
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
15 years 4 months ago #22919
by evolivid
Replied by evolivid on topic Reply from Mark Baker
looking at the electron from the point of view of Quantum Mechanics , then I would
have to say the resonant frequency would be the speed of light , c = 1/2*pi*sqroot LC
then that would make
L = .025/(c^2*C)
would give us the inductance of the magnetic field in the electron.
I suspect that the photon is resonant with the speed of light
and not the electron itself ...
MARX
have to say the resonant frequency would be the speed of light , c = 1/2*pi*sqroot LC
then that would make
L = .025/(c^2*C)
would give us the inductance of the magnetic field in the electron.
I suspect that the photon is resonant with the speed of light
and not the electron itself ...
MARX
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
15 years 4 months ago #22909
by evolivid
Replied by evolivid on topic Reply from Mark Baker
Looking at the up spin and down spins of the electron has made me think that epe each e is a different spin, and that the P spin energy is transferred into radiant Gravity Waves thus its reduced mass!I have been thinking that might be the consequence of unifying the electric and magnetic fields ... which could be tested experimentally
now with gravity waves propagating in each 729 different epe or pep
the electron(s)and positron(s) motions are automatically defined by gravity wave undulations and there effects on each other... Defining the electron(s) path in orbit of the Proton
" Thus eliminating certain aspects of the uncertainty principal namely the Inertia uncertainty "
To put that another way replace the Gravity with Space Time Oscillations and we now have the basis for the framework of space-time in a proton - to which time is effected and the gravity wave interaction with current and voltage would Define the strong-Force and the Weak-Force...in almost a fractal way... but more elegant!
The order of the system shadows its beginnings in that the size of the proton is proportional to all the atoms in existence OR another way to look at it is the energy in the atom is proportional to all the energy in all the protons at the moment it was conceived with its order on a magnitude 1:10x^123.
NOW IF THAT GRAVITY WAVE COULD BE REFLECTED INWARD
Einstein said time travel would be plausible ?
that would mean that the gravity field is unified right???
I THINK ???
MARX
now with gravity waves propagating in each 729 different epe or pep
the electron(s)and positron(s) motions are automatically defined by gravity wave undulations and there effects on each other... Defining the electron(s) path in orbit of the Proton
" Thus eliminating certain aspects of the uncertainty principal namely the Inertia uncertainty "
To put that another way replace the Gravity with Space Time Oscillations and we now have the basis for the framework of space-time in a proton - to which time is effected and the gravity wave interaction with current and voltage would Define the strong-Force and the Weak-Force...in almost a fractal way... but more elegant!
The order of the system shadows its beginnings in that the size of the proton is proportional to all the atoms in existence OR another way to look at it is the energy in the atom is proportional to all the energy in all the protons at the moment it was conceived with its order on a magnitude 1:10x^123.
NOW IF THAT GRAVITY WAVE COULD BE REFLECTED INWARD
Einstein said time travel would be plausible ?
that would mean that the gravity field is unified right???
I THINK ???
MARX
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
15 years 3 months ago #22934
by evolivid
Replied by evolivid on topic Reply from Mark Baker
Thinking along the line of dual space-time with the reverse time vortex I have been thinking what would the reverse time mathematics be and where is a good point to start at, well what i have come up with is this
c^-2 = 1/c^2
when you think about the speed of light and it being being squared you think is that in some way reference its area being important and when you think of the idea that thermodynamically if you heat space-time will a photon be emitted and can one be absorbed as well , then that might lead you to believe that space-time has mass if so what is its mass
and why is that thermodynamically important to a simulation model or the gravity in a proton, right if gravity is really space-time, then you might come to the conclusion that the 4 dimension is really cold like absolute cold, which would give some good discussions on Bose-Einstein
statistics, based on mc^-2 which is a positive number but thermodynamically colder...
which might have reference to its wave or echo in quantum mechanics
MARX
c^-2 = 1/c^2
when you think about the speed of light and it being being squared you think is that in some way reference its area being important and when you think of the idea that thermodynamically if you heat space-time will a photon be emitted and can one be absorbed as well , then that might lead you to believe that space-time has mass if so what is its mass
and why is that thermodynamically important to a simulation model or the gravity in a proton, right if gravity is really space-time, then you might come to the conclusion that the 4 dimension is really cold like absolute cold, which would give some good discussions on Bose-Einstein
statistics, based on mc^-2 which is a positive number but thermodynamically colder...
which might have reference to its wave or echo in quantum mechanics
MARX
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.453 seconds