C Squared

[Jim] My point is that c^2 is not an absolute number as is and has been the asumption. Everything is forced to fit that and therefore is distorted to suit-everything.

So you have said. Sooner or later, an example would be appropriate.

LB

Larry, your need for examples is appreciated. Jim, you're absolutely right that this insane c^2 entity that has survived a century needs to come under dire scrutiny. GD, after my Et/t explanation where one t's Q, one t's T, I'm beginning to see how the entropy theory you're a proponent of works. Also GD, I believe that there's so many damn equations out there it is hard to get the right pic. But when Jim says E=mc^2 is the tail end of F=ma I think he's definitely onto something regarding the simplest ubiquitous particle that still deals with Force and Energy. Enough pretense...

Force/accel=mass=mass=Energy/c^2 hence mass=mass=mass=mass. Obviously these masses are all the same (or the primary mass has been quartered) but please allow me to shed a different light.

m_North=m_East=m_West=m_South thus m_N=m_E=m_W=m_S or upside down this would be seen as m_S=m_E=m_W=m_N. Obviously this equation is as vertical as it's horizontal so it actually looks like

.......m_N
...m_W=m_E
.......m_S

The dots are simply being used to represent drift because nothing's ever truly at rest and also so it lines up correctly which it probably won't but you get the gist anyway hopefully. I call this the 'sphere fractal cone' or the 'zerosphere' that not only is ubiquitous for all particles but also planets, stars, and satellites as well. It's using a 'forcenergy' loop that acts as a closed circuit between force at the start and energy at the end to synchronize the spin of the sphere fractal cone itself so that the North pole isn't spinning one way and the South pole isn't spinning the other. Notice that acceleration is being made proportional to c^2 in the denominator meaning that this baby not only has a linear drift velocity and a nonlinear drift spin velocity but is also able to be accelerated and velo^2 (teleported).

I'll have to think a bit more about the particle path although I believe there's always going to be a measure of uncertainty in any path the sphere fractal cone takes. Yet regarding the conservation of momentum, it's implicitly built right into the zerosphere itself through the forcenergy loop.

Don Omni,

Impressive. I notice that there are only two "e"s in the 'forcenergy' loop. Obviously the eigenprocess of creating this loop has consumed one of them.

Strange. But that's science for you.

Have you characterized the uncertainty in the trajectory of the residual null vector anti-particle momentum, and have you given it a name yet?

LB

Larry,

Glad I've made somewhat of an impression. As for the forcenergy spelling lacking an "e" this's something I started a few years back by unifying words in phrases that end with the same letter as the next word starts with although this isn't the time or space to begin a debate regarding my etymological pursuits. The eigenprocess theory is as good an explanation as I've heard so far though...(^;

I'll get to the uncertainty in trajectory below which brings us to the "...residual null vector anti-particle momentum..." as you've so eloquently put it. As we're dealing with the ubiquitous particle then the ubiquitous anti-particle would be the ubiquitous wave. Once again my pretense rivals the X-Files...

Electric-Force/accel=mass=momentum/velo=mass=Powerxtime/c^2=mass which's actually seen as mass=mass=mass=mass=mass=mass. So these masses are all the same (or the primary mass has been sixthed) but I'll shed another light again.

m_North=m_East=m_Center1=m_Center2=m_West=m_South that vertically and horizontally looks like

....................m_N
.......m_W=m_C1=m_C2=m_E
....................m_S

My name for this is the 'torus fractal wave' or the 'zerotorus'. In essence the zerotorus would be surrounding the zerosphere as the Van Allen belt does the Earth which in terms of the astrological symbol for the sun would be the dot centered in the circle (the symbol for the Target chain of stores). This would horizontally and vertically look like

...........................m_N>\/=m_N
.......m_W=m_C1<\/=m_W=m_E>\/=m_C2=m_E
...........................m_S>\/=m_S


So technically the zerosphere doesn't have a center because it is the center of the zerotorus. This is what I call the 'torusphere fractal' that's represented by the uncertainty trajectory of the wave cone equation E^2/c>\/=h^2/16pi^2tq. Of course the zerosphere has a center but I imagine this center is surrounded by a zerotorus which would be reminiscent of the Katyusha dolls. Also I'm using the inequality symbols because I'm assuming the mass of the zerosphere is greater than or equal to the mass of the zerotorus because the zerosphere is real where the zerotorus is basically an invisible imaginary component surrounding it.

I've chosen F/a=m=m=E/c^2 and E-F/a=m=p/v=m=Pt/c^2=m so that I'm using a 4-dimensional analysis and a 6-dimensional analysis so that this theory is ultimately 'superstring friendly'.

An interesting corrolary involving the humanitarian example is that the 6D analysis could represent the 6 chakras within the human body and the 4D analysis represents the 7th or crown chakra surrounding the whole body. So in this example using a human the zerosphere or human aura actually surrounds the zerotorus or human body which's basically the inverted logic from the zerotorus surrounding the zerosphere. Howev the wave cone equation is inverting so perhaps that's what its inversion means.

Don,

There is something not quite right about your anal ysis. I can't put my finger on it yet, butt until it is fixed you won't have any luck getting *anything* out of your zerotorus, with the possible exception of some dark matter chunks. Or, maybe you will harvest some sphere fartcal cone gas?

LB

PS - What about that name? You guys are kinda slowwww. Aren't you? Ciao for niao, gotta get the fleas off of my dog.