C Squared

More
20 years 11 months ago #6766 by Lotto Cheatah
Replied by Lotto Cheatah on topic Reply from Ron
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Jim</i>
<br /> A nuclear battery is a new concept and would be a very good energy storage device.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
We have one. It's called "Mass".

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 11 months ago #6768 by Lotto Cheatah
Replied by Lotto Cheatah on topic Reply from Ron
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by GD</i>
<br />Jim,

I like the way you write.
I would like to correct you on the first part of your reply:

Matter was created approximately 14 to 15 billion years ago shortly after the Big Bang. As Einstein's equation states, all there needs to be is a tremendous amount of energy. This was made available by an event which occurred shortly before the Big Bang:the complete rundown of the universe.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
According to Big Bang Theory there was no "before the Big Bang". "Shortly before" may fit with another model, not Big Bang.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 11 months ago #6785 by Lotto Cheatah
Replied by Lotto Cheatah on topic Reply from Ron
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Lotto Cheatah</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Jim</i>
<br /> A nuclear battery is a new concept and would be a very good energy storage device.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
We have one. It's called "Mass".
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Battery utilizing the principle e=mc^2:

Required:
1. Mass. Any pebble will do, but a nice calcite crystal or piece of limestone/marble/dolomite keeps things on the Alkali side of the peroidic table.

2. Two catalytic membranes constructed of layered silica Fraunhofer lines (graviton lattice from acid side of the periodic table).

Place one membrane, wire attached, on each side of the pebble. Apply spherical pressure to regulate energy flow.

Note: membrane technology not yet available in 2003.

All things that will happen have happened. You just haven't got there yet.


Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 11 months ago #7175 by Jim
Replied by Jim on topic Reply from
So the energy is stored as mass and that is a battery? If I put a calcite pill in a flashlight can I use the light? You need to do a little more than you have explained here to get the stored energy out of a pill. No doupt the energy is available but how to access it is a problem don't you think?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 11 months ago #6817 by Lotto Cheatah
Replied by Lotto Cheatah on topic Reply from Ron
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Jim</i>
<br />So the energy is stored as mass and that is a battery? If I put a calcite pill in a flashlight can I use the light? You need to do a little more than you have explained here to get the stored energy out of a pill. No doupt the energy is available but how to access it is a problem don't you think?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

The problem is no catalytic membrane yet. The rest of the technolgy already exists.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 11 months ago #7232 by Jim
Replied by Jim on topic Reply from
If most of the basics of transforming energy and mass exist why is so much effort being wasted on fission and fusion processes? The direct transformation process is so much better it seems only fools would be tinkering with other energy processes.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.261 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum