- Thank you received: 0
Kopeikin and "the speed of gravity"
21 years 10 months ago #4627
by Ben
Replied by Ben on topic Reply from Ben
Love this site. Been looking for something like this for quite some time now. Oh, I did place an order for the "pushing gravity" book. Thanks for renewing my thirst in physics.
Ben
Ben
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
21 years 10 months ago #3513
by n/a3
Replied by n/a3 on topic Reply from
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=2 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>[AgoraBasta]:
Gravity can be easily modelled as instantaneous momentum exchange with subsequent energy redistribution through a slow inertial medium (aether/spacetime/vacuum).
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
You've just called on three things no one knows what they are or how they can possibly operate: instantaneous momentum exchange/energy redistribution/slow inertial medium.
You know pal, Einstein became famous by just getting rid off all those boggies and here you go, calling them into play and turning physics 400 years back...180 deg. south...
Relax...
Gravity can be easily modelled as instantaneous momentum exchange with subsequent energy redistribution through a slow inertial medium (aether/spacetime/vacuum).
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
You've just called on three things no one knows what they are or how they can possibly operate: instantaneous momentum exchange/energy redistribution/slow inertial medium.
You know pal, Einstein became famous by just getting rid off all those boggies and here you go, calling them into play and turning physics 400 years back...180 deg. south...
Relax...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
21 years 10 months ago #4628
by Rudolf
Replied by Rudolf on topic Reply from Rudolf Henning
Sorry to be off the topic again but I tried posting a 'suggestion' at the space.com newsgroups asking them to also provide a link to Dr Van Flandern's article (press release) as well. These guys seem to feed the mainstream - things like BB, black holes etc. are still commonly discussed on this site. Their newsletters reach quite a number of people by email and a link on their site could help to set the record 'more' straight.
As for turning 'south, why do you northeners always think of south as negative... We here in the southern hemisphere might think north is negative. Only joking though <img src=icon_smile_wink.gif border=0 align=middle>
Rudolf
As for turning 'south, why do you northeners always think of south as negative... We here in the southern hemisphere might think north is negative. Only joking though <img src=icon_smile_wink.gif border=0 align=middle>
Rudolf
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- AgoraBasta
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
21 years 10 months ago #4763
by AgoraBasta
Replied by AgoraBasta on topic Reply from
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=2 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>[mark]Relax...<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>I'm quite relaxed, thank you...
Sorry I can't say the same of you, though...
And, btw, in your "three things no one knows" you are overgeneralizing, you should be saying rather "none of us da boyz".
Sorry I can't say the same of you, though...
And, btw, in your "three things no one knows" you are overgeneralizing, you should be saying rather "none of us da boyz".
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
21 years 10 months ago #3800
by Abhi
Replied by Abhi on topic Reply from Abhijit Patil
Thanks to my idiot agreement with Stephen Speicher and experiment of Dr. Kopeikin, I am out of USENET for one year.
Now as I have enough time, I was looking at my previous posts and found that you actually warned me not to enter in agreement with Stephen. But at that time, I just thought that there are many people involved in this experiment and there just can't be mistake.
So without reading kopeikin paper and all that mathematical stuff, I entered in agreement with Stephen. Rest is history.
But on second thought, it is good for me. I have lot of time to think about our universe and my theory.
No doubt, I refute the result of kopeikin experiment. Gravity and electricity propagate with I-speed (instanataneous / infinite).
-Abhi.
Every obstacle is just another opportunity to move forward.
Now as I have enough time, I was looking at my previous posts and found that you actually warned me not to enter in agreement with Stephen. But at that time, I just thought that there are many people involved in this experiment and there just can't be mistake.
So without reading kopeikin paper and all that mathematical stuff, I entered in agreement with Stephen. Rest is history.
But on second thought, it is good for me. I have lot of time to think about our universe and my theory.
No doubt, I refute the result of kopeikin experiment. Gravity and electricity propagate with I-speed (instanataneous / infinite).
-Abhi.
Every obstacle is just another opportunity to move forward.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tvanflandern
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
21 years 10 months ago #3349
by tvanflandern
Replied by tvanflandern on topic Reply from Tom Van Flandern
Abhi,
It speaks well of you that you would honor an agreement even though its terms were dishonest. I have doubts that Stephen would have done the same. But he knew it was not a fair bet, or he would never have entered into it. -|Tom|-
It speaks well of you that you would honor an agreement even though its terms were dishonest. I have doubts that Stephen would have done the same. But he knew it was not a fair bet, or he would never have entered into it. -|Tom|-
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.372 seconds