- Thank you received: 0
Gravitational Engineering - What We Can Do Now
- MarkVitrone
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
21 years 8 months ago #5375
by MarkVitrone
Replied by MarkVitrone on topic Reply from Mark Vitrone
Jacques and mechanic, mark got waxed because of vulgar and insulting <u>language</u> not <b>ideas.</b> Opposing views are welcome and necessary to testing and verifying science. Please do not feel censured due to someone else's actions.
Also, I want to build this device once the idea has been sounded by everyone interested in doing so. I like the motto, "Work smart, not hard, and dont leave the keys locked in a running car."
Anyway, I am sorry that there were interruptions to this very useful thread. -MV
Also, I want to build this device once the idea has been sounded by everyone interested in doing so. I like the motto, "Work smart, not hard, and dont leave the keys locked in a running car."
Anyway, I am sorry that there were interruptions to this very useful thread. -MV
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
21 years 8 months ago #5124
by jacques
Replied by jacques on topic Reply from
MV <BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=2 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote> Jacques and mechanic, mark got waxed because of vulgar and insulting language not ideas<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
Sorry but I never used vulgar or insulting language
Sorry but I never used vulgar or insulting language
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Larry Burford
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
21 years 8 months ago #5255
by Larry Burford
Replied by Larry Burford on topic Reply from Larry Burford
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=2 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
[Jacques]
Sorry but I never used vulgar or insulting language
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
I think if you re-read MV's comment closely, you will see that he did not say or imply that you did.
Regards,
LB
[Jacques]
Sorry but I never used vulgar or insulting language
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
I think if you re-read MV's comment closely, you will see that he did not say or imply that you did.
Regards,
LB
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
21 years 8 months ago #5256
by jacques
Replied by jacques on topic Reply from
LB
I did reread and saw the comma <img src=icon_smile.gif border=0 align=middle> That reassure me. Thank you for your clarification.
I did reread and saw the comma <img src=icon_smile.gif border=0 align=middle> That reassure me. Thank you for your clarification.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- MarkVitrone
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
21 years 8 months ago #5087
by MarkVitrone
Replied by MarkVitrone on topic Reply from Mark Vitrone
Jacques, sorry for any miscommunication.
I am rather sloppy with punctuation (my wife teaches grammar, she reminds me of this often). Anyway, I am glad that I remembered my comma.
On the "idea"...
After reading the last few posts without participating I am convinced of two things.
1. The SOG will not be measured in this experiment due tolerance control problems beyond our control, the various ones I am speaking of have been deliberated and I will not expand on them now.
2. This experiment will not detect FTL communication unless the system, defined as the crystal setup, is contained in a vacuum at very low temperatures. Oxygen cannot be present at the low temp due to its paramagnetic properties that would undoubtedly interfere with the electrical expectations of the crystal. The vacuum is necessary so that as many MI's as possible are removed. What is left? The LCM, gravity, and hopefully the jitterbug (the planned for effect).
Comments? - MV
I am rather sloppy with punctuation (my wife teaches grammar, she reminds me of this often). Anyway, I am glad that I remembered my comma.
On the "idea"...
After reading the last few posts without participating I am convinced of two things.
1. The SOG will not be measured in this experiment due tolerance control problems beyond our control, the various ones I am speaking of have been deliberated and I will not expand on them now.
2. This experiment will not detect FTL communication unless the system, defined as the crystal setup, is contained in a vacuum at very low temperatures. Oxygen cannot be present at the low temp due to its paramagnetic properties that would undoubtedly interfere with the electrical expectations of the crystal. The vacuum is necessary so that as many MI's as possible are removed. What is left? The LCM, gravity, and hopefully the jitterbug (the planned for effect).
Comments? - MV
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.348 seconds