New Dark Matter Hypothesis

A star is composed by a set amount of mass. And as you probably know a black hole got an extreme density. This would leave either a "hollow" space inside your star or making this star it somehow shrink during the ages. Also, Aren’t black holes supposed to swallow anything close to them, meaning that as soon as you get just a small black hole inside a star, It will grow extremely fast as it draws all that mass into it. Disabling your theory of a slow created black hole.

Don’t get me wrong, the hypothesis really sounds nice and it could explain a lot of thing about our universe, If your hypothesis can fix those flaws I just posted, I think you might actually got something. But for now, keep working on it.

Recall that a black hole is matter collpased to a single point. So, if its at a single point then the center of the star won't be hollow.

You might say, still, if the black hole is in a single point, there is still the event horizon, is there not? Actually, its quite logical that there won't be a nonzero radius of the event horizon either. Consider that the single point black hole is warping the space-time around the blackhole so heavily that the parts of the star not engoulfed, yet, by the black hole are right up next to the black hole.

I have excellent hypothetical grounds that predict the Schwarzschild radius when measured directly with electromagnetic waves will always result in a zero (or simply inconclusive) measurement.

To explain all this, please see the following URL (due to the HTML-parsing of this messageboard I cannot adequately illustrate these concepts here):
tinyurl.com/yqqbl

Regarding the other point you bring up, isn't the blackhole supposed to swallow up whats around it. Yes, it is, and in my hypothesis it still does this. Simply at a much slower pace. The reason we think it happens so fast is because we would only realize that this happens quickly once the entire star is engoulfed, and this naturally does happen very quickly. However, there is no reason to suspect that the blackhole is not slowly eating the star from the inside out leading up to that point.

mhelland@techmocracy.net

Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't there a need for a forceful implosive event to produce a black hole, or a body with so great a density to produce gravity that traps even light?

Black holes need a certain momentum, an implosive force, no? Otherwise it would rest as one big neutron star nucleus and refuse to collapse even further. (as far as I understand the process)



--
Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle lecture is tomorrow in Memorial Hall OR at 9 o'clock.

Yes, what I'm really saying is the core of a very large visible star may have a density so great that its core is a black hole, with the rest of the visible star swirling in towards it.

The real unique part is that the swirl in happens slowly, instead of a sudden collapse which is generally predicted.

mhelland@techmocracy.net