"Evicting Einstein"

More
20 years 2 months ago #11515 by Jim
Replied by Jim on topic Reply from
LB, I read a few papers that said the calculation is made using the Schwartchild radius divided by the radius of the light as measured at perihelion. It gives a cos of the angle of deflection. TVF is another perspective than this which is not in the mix.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 2 months ago #11405 by Jim
Replied by Jim on topic Reply from
TVF, A lot of this stuff is made up as it was being writen. The factors of r/R and 1/r just were applied as were a lot of other "trim to suit" factors. They got established because they worked not because anyone had an understanding of why-they didnot care why it worked as long as it did work. This process of finding something that works is how chimps and birds use tools. Nothing is explained but it works so--

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 2 weeks ago #11723 by Meta
Replied by Meta on topic Reply from Robert Grace
186,283 mps was attributed to light instead of to non-dimension space,
Space dragging was attributed to mass instead of to non-dimension space,
Space twisting was attributed to mass instead of to non-dimension space,
Geodetic precession was attributed to mass instead of to non-dimension space,
Gravity was attributed to mass instead of to non-dimension space,
Time was attributed to 4D instead of to 0D gravity,
Light bending was attributed to gravity instead of to optical, non-dimension space,
All because non-dimension space could not easily be measured, therefore the measurers were not needed.
05/19/04 Robert Grace

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.236 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum