Antigravity Research

Hi Stoat,

By the way thanks for your insights (especially insights regarding BEC)! Just having morning cup of coffee and re-reading articles....So much to absorb! But, first impressions are that similar ideas are brewing regarding BECS, HIGGS FIELDS (Murayama says..."If we turned it off, mass would vanish and everything would fly apart in a nanosecond,"...), missing GRAVITON (dissapears into another dimension....actually it is FTL and has to operate at significant ENERGY LEVELS above TEV and frequencies of light...it is the fourth dimensional power source).

Also, I think that an inverse order prevails...from top to bottom frequencies that would be layered as part of greater linkage to our hyperdimensional universe power structure...with in the atom. So, we might glimpse 'greater order and shape of universe' but will not be able to see these extreme frequencies beyond light as this geometry within atom will reveal greater symmetries of these outer regions of our all encompasing scales(each one imbedded in the other, and then inverse order larger becomes smaller within atomic scale) as they are represented in a top to bottom reverse order so that highest largest scale 'energy' becomes smallest inner most scale. An inverse scale mirror of greater order, and all of these scale energies/waveforms would annihilate with antimatter pairs as the reverse portion of current. Mass regeneration is very complex...and I am certain that there is exact mathematical repetitions that appear as a unified structure...expanding this structure towards an infinity.

Well, its a beautiful day on da big island, I agree with you think I will enjoy my "five mile across universe" here and go surfing! Have a great day!

John

The bottom of that picture looks like what I described as a volcano shaped energy slope for a proton. It's just been flipped over and flattened out a lot. In reality, i think it would be very tall and very thin. As a wine bottle bottom model, if the mound in the centre pushed up over the rim of the pale orange portion of the image, then it would be truly 'negative energy." Now, I don't think it ever does this. I think the universe operates rather like a voltage divider. Say we connect it to a nine volt battery. The mid point of the voltage divider is at 4.5 volts but we say that it's at zero. Then we say when we look at a sinusoidal waveform, that half the wave form is negative but it's really only negative in respect to this half way line, it's really always positive. The universe has this line set not at the half way point but at the speed of light. If we drew a graph of gravity, to a one to one scale, it would look like a half wave rectification. We'd need to zoom in on the horizontal to see that there is a tiny curve of "leakage." Unfortunately that's where we live [][8D] Now, we could feel very humble about that but it's better for the old ego to think that things have to be that wway, in order that we can lay on the sofa in holey socks and watch football; that's soccer by the way []

RECIPROCAL MOTION UNIVERSE, HIGGS FIELDS, ELYSIUM, AND TVF GRAVITON:

So what is the force that powers atoms, creates galaxies, and binds all matter; and, if that force suddenly disappeared would matter in our visible isotropic universe still exist?

My answer to that question would be NOTHING could exist period without a circuit being completed powering all imbedded mass/scales within the larger rotational aspects of UNIVERSE. Nothing can exist with out a hierarchy of principles, a hierarchy of energies, and a hierarchy of frequencies of waveforms that make up all the particles that form mass within imbedded scales within a Universe; that everything exists in reciprocal motion not only around centers but that all motion is caused by the exchange of energies in a constant balanced state between a forward and reverse wave circuits at all levels in all scales....The problem is 'cosmological constants' are ill defined, have zero connection to any reciprocal motion other then a faith based principle that states simply that 'space expands' and 'dark energy' exists to explain ‘red shifts’ and this apparent expansion. The other problem with both quantum theory and Big Bang cosmological models is that again we do not recognize any power source for exchanging momentum and maintaining the integrity of mass in motion, we do not recognize faster then light energies, we do not recognize that FTL energies most likely operate at significant frequencies above the light spectrum and that is why we cannot see these particles in motion...

There is a lack of cause and effect relationships in existing theory, and the bias in academia is unfortunate and totally lacks any freedom to think beyond a belief system that Universe just exists with no apparent rotation around a center in its isotropic state,[small view limits ability to see big picture] and that space expands because of the Big Bang which was caused by what? The only cause and effect relationship for balancing ‘Universe gravitational collapse’ [what is cause of gravity??? Certainly not curved space] between ‘expanding space’ and ‘collapsing galactic planes’, is a dual motion multi-scale super-symmetric balanced motion between forward and reverse large scale multi-spectrum union of opposites in reciprocal motion around each other, not a BIG BANG.

The BIG BANG is logically impossible, and as far as I am concerned a dead issue not really even worth discussing.

Let’s get on with it and get into the real nuts and bolts of how our Universe really works. So, in review TVF model is the best view of Universe that we have right now because two factors, 1) speed of graviton in pushing gravity makes us look at possible frequencies above light as factor in defining motions in Universe. 2) multi-scales that is even more important an understanding because that defines a wrap around for the quantum theories on a three dimensional basis and makes the fourth dimension a conduit attached to a hierarchy. Back to HIERARCHIES, hierarchies of scales, energies, spectrums. We now are unstuck….So, going from a stuck view to an unstuck view is a good thing. It means that we can now see how a Universe can have structure on large scales…..

The existing visible three dimensional Universe is very small view and does not show the rotation required to maintain this scale which I believe is going to be at a very high rate due to our scale being imbedded in the higher scale that creates the Gravitons. The HIGGS Field operates FTL & HFTL [higher frequencies then Light], back to hierarchies again and the Elysium most likely is a HIGGS type field and maybe the lines of force that allows light to spin around [charged particles spin around lines of force when in motion]. The notion that particles are mass-less and carry zero charge is also false because of super-symmetry. All particles even neutrons [anti-neutrons] carry some sort of charge and have mass.

Well, there is a crack that is widening and physicists are waking up as noted in the above treatment on future thinking about Quantum Physics by Murayama regarding all mass being maintained by this liquid HIGGS field a BEC. I think we are finally getting somewhere, okay here is the deal Supersymmetry fits exactly with a reciprocal motion model of Universe. We just have to merge this now with multiple spectrum multiple scale Universe model, with largest scale smallest HFTL fields of particles and that every other scale is a cascade [imbedded within parent scale] of collapsing high frequencies towards ‘holes’ lower frequencies. This cascade keeps going down the scales of frequencies like a hierarchy that is a balanced circuit that ‘switches’ in a constant state of regeneration between forward wave incoming and reverse wave outgoing to complete circuit. This switching takes place at three trillion times per second in our scale and fits perfectly with TVF model of Graviton.

TVF Pushing Gravitons, transparency equivalence model shows that all mass is equally being impacted by these smaller scale particles that have a relative short range but travel at extreme speeds approaching 2x10^10 c, or 20 billion x the speed of light. The question now is where do these ultra small waveforms originate from, and why are they so small and how in fact do these 'impacts' affect all atomic scale structures? It is a big question, here is why:

Because if Gravitons exist and operate FTL then this finally gets physics going in the right direction away from limits on speed of motion, and separates classes of matter into a hierarchy of scales. Mirror Universes, Supersymmetry, HIGGS FIELDS, Elysium, and a few new ideas such as 'FTL/HFTL Gravitostatic Fields' will now complete the picture of how our Universe functions and all mass is maintained in a constant regenerative state.

John W. Rickey

I suppose that we have to ask the question, whether at the boundary of our neg r.i. BEC sun, Cooper pairs swap over to being positron pairs, or we have a time reversal. Actually we can think of it as being either. As long as we don't fall into the trap of thinking of time as being a fourth spatial dimension. That time can have its own metric is a separate issue.

If we say that things swap over in a neg r.i. volume, then that invisible "electron like" node connecting with our three quarks, starts to make some sort of sense.

Hi Stoat,

You bring up some interesting considerations regarding the 'Cooper pair' effect of two electrons sharing a polarized attraction that allows for superconductance so that the current can flow without resistance. These Cooper pairs are still operating in forward portion of wave motion and reveal a pre-flipping state [prior to flipping neg r.i./reverse state that would flow invisibly away from our time zone] or condition that results from the Graviton impact/currents/gravitostatic ftl/hftl process. Could Cooper pairs reveal a magnification process [similar to magnetic effects] because 'paired resonance' anchors the greater surrounding gravitostatic resonance and polarizations created from the graviton/antigraviton reversals creating 'lines of force' and 'BEC' liquid semi-rigid state between the two electrons resulting in zero resistance. Need to examine the various effects found to look at how the higher 'currents' anchor, will report back once I have reviewed the literature.

Regarding TIME every scale has a positive and negative motion that can only be measured in relation to our time zone of forward motion. You are correct the fourth dimension cannot be measured from our scale since it operates outside of our visible spectrum of motion and we can only measure the effects of that motion in our time and relative motion. Same goes for the reverse wave that moves at FTL speeds away from our scale and operates outside of our time zone of motion.

In a multiple spectrum multiple scale Universe, TIME is a function of speed of motion within any given scale. The lower frequency slower motion spectrums would appear to operate at a faster rate of time [in comparison to higher frequency faster motion spectrum/scales], this presents many possibilities that some sort of time travel may be possible. Quantum tunneling may reveal how 'jumping through time' might be possible.

John

Hi John,

Well, at this 3 km boundary in our sun, we have inertial energy and gravitational energy in balance. The nature of a bec is to slow everything down but the neg r.i. region allows for things to speed up.

Suppose that at this boundary we do have the cooper pair flow switching from clockwise to anticlockwise. Put a neutron at the boundary line, and we could have cooper pairs going into orbit round the neutron. At this zone, we have zero entropy, so we can have k capture. That's where an electron drops down into the nucleus and disrupts it. If we say that a cooper pair is the linear form of what we have with an atom in a radial form. Two cooper pairs in orbit look like the k shell and the l sub shell, which hold two electrons each. Not sure yet where that thought is going. The build up of elements in multiples of four has some bearing on it though.

Another thought is that, never mind zero entropy, I think we have as close as we can get to absolute zero at the boundary of neg and pos r.i. space. It's very cold there [8D][] One would have to take their thermal long johns to vacation there[]

Further in from the boundary we can have photons moving slower than they can move in that sort of space. They "want" to be moving at the top speed allowable, which is many times faster than their bec speed in pos r.i. space. It's here that we seem to be looking at a back to front movie of energy flow. Faster than light gravitons, on the other hand, don't "see" the same refractive index. They slow down but are only going at the speed of light, close to a radius which is about the radius of an atomic nucleus. The wine bottle bottom is much more peaked than the image posted. Accept that gravity goes faster than light and it simply has to be more peaked.

Note that if gravity and the speed
of light are the same, then we would have a ball of something in the middle of our sun that would be simply not there. Nothing could escape it. I think that that would be just plain silly []