Antigravity Research

Hey John

I keep thinking about the electron going in and out of existence and thinking
it might have something to do with time flowing backward ... maybe in a higher dimension(which i have been really
hoping was a dimension of all of time) but makes since at high speeds
the electromagnetic photon flipping polarity is what made me really think about it
if its a wave and the north and south are like positive and negative ,
then you think about the torque from something like that creating a vortex to where?
disapering for a moment into the past a higher dimension , really what happens when
something mass-less exceeds the speed of light...

is space moving or is light jumping into the future...
and if electrons and positrons are made of light ...
and atoms are made of electrons and positrons then
"time is not flowing forward matter is" ?
and so then gravity is created by matter moving into the future!

unless photons are made of space-time...
and electrons are made of photons... ect...

MARX

So then would that mean that in a 4D space-time that the electron flips into the vortex and in reverse time is a positron ???

and what is its energy in the vortex as it echos out of existence into the 4 Dimension, (or reverse space-time) mass is not negitive or positive might mc^-2 be its vortex wave energy ???

which might define why gravity waves are made when something moves with in the circumference of c^-2 at or faster then the speed of light doesn't gain mass but the extra energy makes gravity waves
moving inside the inverse boundary of the space-time speed of light frame-work

MARX

Hi Marx,

I had an incredible time at the SPACE FRONTIER FOUNDATION conference at NASA Ames Research. We are still on the mainland up in Tom's northwest on Discovery Bay and will be leaving for Hawaii on Friday.

In order to understand quantum motions we must look at how energy is exchanged between large scale interactions. I have come to the conclusion that our existing quantum model of proton's is flawed because we have failed to recognize how graviton flow is cause for mass to exist in first place, and that polarity reversals stream off of all forward time matter as a result of this greater 4D interaction. Therefore, Protons are most likely a toroid with one quark and one antiquark racing at 3.3 trillion times per second around a core where the vertical axis is the exiting antigraviton stream forming the gravity well. G-Forces are repulsive and the existing polarity reversals of the Antigravitons forms the matrix for all mass formations to take place forming the gravity well that enables all structural mass integrity and lattice formations to take place.

Matter is a perfect exchange system of creation between forward and reverse time. Collider experiments fail to understand the CPT symmetry is not broken, what is broken is the reasoning behind what is visually seen during the collisions. We are so wrong on how energy is exchanged in Universe that our blind wisdom has allowed all sorts of incorrect assumptions about quantum physics. I predict LHC experiments will only compound the problem with even higher amounts of gluon string quark and antiquark subparticle formations taking place during collisions.

I have to go to the gym with my daughter so will comment more on this later, John

NEUTRON'S ARE FAILED PROTONS

Neutrons form from Protons that absorb an Electron. So, now the Proton Graviton Capture mechanism causing antimatter induction and gravity well bursts of antigravitons, has become Neutralized by the entruding Electron. We now have a mechanism to expand atomic structure, adding mass to the nuclear core with the neutralized Nuetron. What is interesting is that Neutron's can go back to becoming Proton's and when this occurs the Neutron emits both an Electron and an Antineutrino.

I think that probably the Neutron's core now becomes occupied by the Electron which inhibits antimatter induction and causes the Neutron to orbit along with Electrons around Proton. There is much to study regarding lateral emmissions and just how Neutron's appear to be plugged up Protons and are useful probes because of the neutralized state. What is even more astounding is how the gravitomagnetic FTL field must be repulsed by the electron core, which presents a problem in defining the processes involved in creating NEUTRON STARS. There is much to be explored in just how NEUTRON STARS operate in terminating graviton polarity reversals.

So far I think the Neutron is a failed Proton, and since it has lost its role in terminating forward time Gravitons the Neutron most likely operates within the lateral ranges of decays and emmissions. Next, I hope to study further the functions of Neutrons and to take a look at the relationship between Neutron Stars and Electrons. Proton emmissions spinning away from Solar Cores from repulsed magnetic fields that terminate gravitons in vertical antigraviton emmissions and eventual Neutron densities must be explained in terms of a progressive state. This greater process may involve antimatter cores being formed in stars. John W. Rickey

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Stoat</i>
<br />Oh yeah, so what created the neutron? One more thing on the neutron, to help balance the books its thought that with the neutrons decay we must regard the neutrino as an antineutrino.

When a proton is converted into a neutron, we get a neutron, a positron and a neutrino. This begs the question, do we have an anti graviton, and an anti photon for that matter? I can see no reason why not, Which is which? That's anther good question which I'm clueless about at the moment.

Note though that the nucleus is supposed to stay together, against the repulsion of like charged protons, by the protons swopping back and forth, between being protons and neutrons. The graviton and compton wavelength photon are without doubt involved in that interaction.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Hi Stoat, Well now it was during these previous posts that we asked the question "what formed the Neutron?" in regards to the GRAVITON CYCLE. We now know that GRAVTON CAPTURE causes polarity reversals forming ANTIGRAVITONS in cores of PROTON'S, and we also know that ELECTRON CAPTURE occurs when a proton combines with an orbiting electron, and emits a neutrino and becomes a NEUTRON. Do you also think that a positron is emmited? The reason I ask is that there is a symmetry question here because NEUTRON emmissions from nucleus cores decay into protons and emit an electron and an antineutrino---so, sounds like the gravitomagnetic field strength outside of the nucleus is too strong and "pops" the electron out of the core. The NEUTRON was safe with in a coupled electric field inside atomic nucleus maintaining Neutron stability but once outside the atomic nucleus the GRAVITON CAPTURE process re-ignites antimatter induction within core causing Electron and Antineutrino emmission. John

Hi John, I'll have to get back to you on this, as I need to dig up Robert Carroll's take on k capture. His model of the neutron is a toroid which has equal numbers of alternating positrons and electrons arranged round the toroid.

At the moment I'm still going quietly insane over the wonderful world of the cgs system and the si system of units. I think the main one to look at is electrostatic unit. I need to do the sums with the values to nine places but I keep putting it off. Roughly speaking, we've got force = k_e * Q_1 * Q_2 / r^2
Take the radius as the Compton wavelength, about 2.4E-12 and work out the force, but force equals mass times acceleration, divide through by the mass of an electron and we get a huge number! I think it's going to be twice the speed of gravity.