Antigravity Research

Leaks from SARA about the replication of Nazi Bell experiments have shown that levitation and warping of fields around objects is possible that affect both time and gravity. It will be interesting to see the results of the Gravity Probe B experiment to be posted in 2007. EM field outflows and frame dragging results from a unified field that is caused by graviton absorption inflows. If this unified field can be interferred with which evidence exists that has shown objects levitating, disappearing and reappearing in the existing frame, then not only is time (unified field controls rate of time and relative motion) involved but also a decoupling of the graviton absorption might actually produce a repulsive effect or MI graviton emmissions.

John

Here is a recent interview with Mel Winfield discussing the Hutchison Effect and Nucleonic Energy dynamics:

www.americanantigravity.com/documents/Me...nfield-Interview.pdf

Suppose that the American Empire and the Soviet Empire did capture vehicles from the German Empire at the end of WWII. Vehicles with working anti-gravity drives that could lift the vehicles from the ground and push them through the air.

At what point in time would evidence of this technology become strong enough to force things out into the open?

===

My guess is 25 years tops. Any more than that and I would tend to discount the premise as false. Mainly because something like that would be so big (so v*ry f*ck*ng b*g) that it could not be kept secret even by shooting people. (Unless you shot them all, I guess. And then you'd have to explain the sudden increase in the murder/accident/suicide rate among physicists and engineers and technicians working on black programs in both countries. Easier for them, of course. And it is likely that at least a few people working on something like that would leave "dead man letters" addressed to various university and press outfits and containing enough details to build a working model.)

Did I mention that it would be a big thing?

LB

Larry it is one thing to be a skeptic, but unless you have done your research on this subject the term "foolish" comes to mind.

DISCLOSURE PROJECT:

BACKGROUND BRIEFING POINTS

FOR CONGRESSIONAL HEARINGS & LEGISLATION

The Disclosure Project is a non-profit research effort that has, since 1993, been identifying top-secret military, government and other witnesses to UFO and Extraterrestrial events.


To date, several hundred such witnesses have been identified throughout the world and spanning every branch of the armed services, the NRO, DIA, CIA, NASA, the former USSR, and other agencies and countries. Over 100 have been videotaped, thus far; 70 have been transcribed into edited testimony. A four hour videotape summary of testimony and an over 500 page briefing document is available that contains excerpts of this historic testimony.


The weight of this testimony, along with supporting government documents and other evidence, establishes beyond any doubt the reality of extraterrestrial life forms, UFOs, or extraterrestrial vehicles, and advanced energy and propulsion technologies resulting from the study of these vehicles.


The testimony and evidence proves that these vehicles have been tracked on radar on many occasion, have landed and/or crashed on terra firma, and have been retrieved and studied by specialized and compartmentalized projects. Advanced technologies which have been identified from the study of these vehicles, once disclosed, will replace currently used forms of energy generation and propulsion. These technologies will enable the Earth to attain a sustainable civilization without pollution, energy shortages, or global warming. These technologies are already fully operational. They have been developed within super-secret, unacknowledged special access projects. In short, the definitive solution to the world's energy, pollution, and poverty problems exists within compartmentalized projects that need planned disclosure and relevant legislation.


The programs controlling this issue are operating outside of legally required Congressional oversight. Even Presidents have been left out of the loop, deliberately deceived, and denied access. Therefore, urgent action is needed on the part of Congress, the White House, and other institutions to obtain the necessary oversight and control of these operations to ensure that these now-classified technologies are prepared for disclosure and the eventual near-term application for world cooperative energy generation and propulsion.


A clear and on-going threat to the national security and world peace has arisen because of unauthorized covert actions that have led to the targeting and downing of these extraterrestrial vehicles and to related covert plans to weaponize space. Since it can be proven that we are sharing space with other civilizations, it is critical that a full disclosure of this long suppressed information take place, and that the National Missile Defense System (NMD/BMD/SDI.) be re-evaluated by policy makers in light of these revelations.


There is no evidence that these extraterrestrial civilizations are hostile to humanity or the Earth. Rather, the testimony shows that they are very concerned about nuclear and space-based weapons systems, and human warfare. Therefore, a cooperative world policy and law must be immediately established to prohibit the targeting and striking of these vehicles.


Urgent Congressional, White House and UN action is needed to allow any and all witnesses to testify under oath so that a full, honest and open disclosure may occur this year, 2001, including witnesses with high level security clearances.


A US Presidential Executive Order is needed to protect these military, government, and other witnesses, and to declassify secret projects and their related technologies.


The world community needs to research and develop diplomatic programs and protocols, laws and treaties to address this issue and to interface with these civilizations in a manner that is peaceful, non-violent and mutually beneficial.
WE, THE PEOPLE, CALL ON THE U.S. CONGRESS:

To hold open, secrecy-free hearings on the UFO / Extraterrestrial presence on and around Earth.


To hold open hearings on advanced energy and propulsion systems related to the subject that, when publicly released, will provide solutions to global environmental and other challenges.


To enact legislation which will ban all space-based weapons.


To enact comprehensive legislation to research, develop and explore space peacefully and cooperatively with all cultures on Earth and in space.

THE NON-DISCLOSURE PROJECT:

The US SPACE COMMAND MANIFESTO. Here is where you really need to do your research and read statements that pertain to our abilities in space. In no way will the DOD allow full disclosure period. Only a fool would think that the US cannot keep a secret. It is called plausible deniability even when there are pictures of triangular craft or other weapon systems that have direct access to space.

John

TOM BEARDEN COMMENTS ON "NEGATIVE ENERGY," "ANTIGRAVITY," AND "MILLS, BLACK LIGHT POWER PROCESS." DOES "NEGATIVE MASS" EXIST IN OUR UNIVERSE?

Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 12:12 PM

Subject: RE: Ken Rauen Explains Dr. Mill's Blacklightpower process

Les,

Well, if you go deeply into it, it gets very complicated very fast. But there is reason to the rhyme.

E.g.: what is a sub-quantum atom? Sub-quantum normally means VIRTUAL. And a virtual electron, virtual atom, whatever would normally “radiate” except in the virtual state, subquantally. So the better statement might be that a virtual-state atom has no observable EM radiation.

From where I’m coming, dark matter is an related but somewhat different thing, using the Dirac sea model of the vacuum. The “electron vacuum” (the normal vacuum) is comprised of negative mass-energy holes, each filled with a positive-energy electron. We know (and nonequilibrium thermodynamics agrees, since it directly allows violation of the second law of thermodynamics almost at will) that a strong gradient across a little region of the vacuum will lift out some of those hidden electrons, providing a sudden real electron current (often encountered in the Lenz law effect where one sharply tries to reverse an ongoing process involving a current; momentarily the ongoing current INCREASES, and of course that is measured many times and long since experimentally shown and validated. What the electrical engineering Lenz law effect “model” does not normally consider is (1) where the excess electrons came from and how, and (2) what was the corresponding effect on the vacuum from which the electrons were lifted? Indeed, that does leave behind – at least momentarily – some “unfilled” Dirac holes (again, which are NEGATIVE MASS ENERGY ELECTRONS). As source charges themselves, these negative mass-energy electrons emit NEGATIVE ENERGY photons which, at light speed, produce and continually replenish the associated NEGATIVE ENERGY EM FIELDS of those negative mass-energy electrons (those holes).

In my view, these negative mass-energy electrons (holes) and their currents are in fact the long-sought “dark matter”, and they produce ANTI-gravity rather than gravity, due to their negative mass-energy which curves spacetime in the opposite direction from the curvature due to positive mass-energy.

The negative energy EM fields and potentials associated with the dark matter holes and hole currents are the so-called “dark energy”, again in my view.

The beauty of this view is that one can readily evoke such dark matter currents and dark energy currents in circuits by special use, and suddenly one has an experimental basis for one’s conclusions. Bedini has been evoking such dark matter currents and dark energy flows in his circuitry for some years, but just calling it “radiant energy” (as Tesla seems to have also dubbed it). Since there are real experimental results on the bench, and one who works with John for awhile can learn to generate them and replicate them, then the requisites for a beginning science and technology of “dark energy” and “dark matter” – from this viewpoint – has already been laid down by John Bedini. John and I also filed a PPA on evoking and using such energy and matter currents in real EM circuits; when we are able to afford it, we will file a formal patent application.

The peculiar characteristics of EM negative energy flow makes the use of dark energy particularly attractive and useful, since it readily produces free “energy gain” by the environment’s continual insistence on inserting (converging) extra excess negative energy into one’s energy flows, at any impedance encountered by the negative energy flow. Hence when charging a battery with negative energy, one “connects” the battery terminals “backwards” to normal practice – and the impedance of the battery results in the environment freely furnishing three or four times as much negative energy to the charging of the impedance as what the operator has to input himself. The result is a clearly COP>1.0 process, which nonetheless obeys the laws of physics and nonequilibrium thermodynamics.

Further, with this testable approach to dark energy and dark matter, one can indeed account for the odd gravitational forces that hold the spiral arms of the spiral galaxies together. But the forces are antigravity forces back upon the galactic arm matter, from gatherings and collections of dark matter currents that have cumulated outside the galactic arms. One can also account for the mysterious “drag” forces produced on the Pioneer spacecraft, which of course are known and experimentally measured. And lastly but most importantly, one can test and examine the odd behavior of such dark energy flows and dark matter currents in real circuits, on the lab bench.

To do a scientific approach, one normally attempts to construct a mathematical model and view that captures and describes the phenomenology being produced in one’s experimental results in the laboratory (or in some cases, observed at a distance in the universe). The combination of the two – a fitted model and the substantiating experimental results – then produces a legitimate theory of the phenomena, at least sufficient for the beginning. As additional phenomenology is uncovered, either the original model must account for it, or else the model must be extended or changed, as necessary to continue to agree with experiment.

So in my view, we are in the very early stages of beginning a technology of dark matter and dark energy, in our EM circuits and systems and in our electrical power circuits.

Practical antigravity also follows, since the negative mass-energy hole repels normal positive mass-energy matter. So if intense flows of such hole currents (and their associated dark energy fields and potentials) are evoked in one’s circuit, then one’s unit can exhibit practical antigravity.

The Sweet VTA device produced self-oscillation in the tremendously strong binding energy fields of the nuclei of the barium atoms in the barium ferrite magnets used by Sweet. Since binding energy is also “negative” energy, then his device produced very powerful self-oscillation of very powerful negative energy EM fields and potentials directly inside the barium nucleus – in there where the protons and neutrons are! (Note here the touching or possible touching with Mills’ theory. Would not an oscillation of the negative binding energy of these nucleons also involve producing some “lowered state” nucleons, at least temporarily?).

The oscillations of negative binding energy also produced very powerful “unfilled Dirac hole” type currents right in those barium nuclei and outward. The result, due to the tremendous negative energy density being produced, did produce practical antigravity in the Sweet device. I designed the experiment used by Sweet to demonstrate that effect, and convinced him (beyond all reason back then, from a “positive energy” view!) to simply add significantly more impedance to his load, in steps, and then test the device as each increment was added. As the additional impedance was added in steps, the weight of the object on the bench decreased. Until, with the impedance doubled, the unit had lost 90% of its normal weight on a good scales. Later Sweet did levitate the device on a tether string tied to a bedpost, and flew it around by tilting it (with another string) so a linear propulsion component developed. The actual results of the first part of the experiments (loss of 90% of the unit’s weight) was included in the paper I wrote, which is Floyd Sweet and T. E. Bearden, "Utilizing Scalar Electromagnetics to Tap Vacuum Energy," Proceedings of the 26th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference (IECEC '91), Boston, Massachusetts, 1991, p. 370-375. Unfortunately Sweet later died and never fully revealed the activation secret by which barium ferrite magnetic materials could be triggered into sustained self-oscillation at 60 Hertz. Weak self-oscillation of such permanent magnetic materials at higher frequency is known in the conventional literature, of course, particularly in thin films magnetic research.

I also tried very hard to get Sweet to call in leading members of the scientific community and do this experiment themselves, but a very professional attempt was made on his life, frightening him immensely. He was absolutely convinced (and I believe now he was correct) that he would quickly be killed if he ever touched the antigravity aspects again.

Anyway, this view, using basically the Dirac sea theory as an initial starting part, is where I’m coming from with respect to dark energy and dark matter. So far, at least this testable approach is consistent with the observed dark energy and dark matter astrophysical effects etc. A good math model for all this, however, requires the use of higher group symmetry algebra and higher group symmetry electrodynamics, since the “normal” old electrical engineering model falsely assumes an inert vacuum and a flat spacetime (as well as many other falsities, such as arbitrarily exclusion of all Lorentz asymmetrical systems – and we are in fact discussing Lorentz asymmetrical systems!. One gets dark energy and dark matter – at least in this approach – only when the vacuum is active and the spacetime is deliberately curved in a “negative energy enforced” direction. In short, rigorously we are attempting to study those asymmetrical EM systems that Lorentz in 1892 and all electrical engineering departments have arbitrarily discarded since then.

Mills’ theory is more advanced in that he has produced at least sufficient supporting math models for the beginning, and he has an experimental basis behind his demonstrated results. Note that lowering the ground state of the hydrogen ion (the proton) is indeed a negative mass-energy change. Assuming that sufficient lowering (negative energy change) can be induced, then one would in fact be speaking of a sort of “Dirac proton hole” once a proton’s worth of positive energy had radiated away.

One of the problems facing researchers in this area is that Dirac himself hated negative energy, and tried very hard to get rid of it in his electron theory. He failed, so he placed it in his Dirac sea concept of the vacuum. But then, once the positive mass-energy electron is popped out of the hole, leaving the negative mass-energy hole, he did some arduous straining in reason to conclude that the hole would then depart (there are the hole currents!) and in turn be replaced at the original position by a filled hole (a piece of normal Dirac sea vacuum). In short, in Dirac’s view attempting to observe the hole would result in filling it with a positive mass-energy electron in that sense, which is a lessoning of the negative energy of the hole in the positive energy direction and a reversal of the hole’s deeply negative charge to zero charge (i.e., a change in the positive charge direction). In short, he then stated that this change would be observed as a POSITRON, which of course has positive mass-energy and positive energy EM fields – quite different from the isolated hole. This observed positron IS NOT the hole that departed – because that hole has negative mass-energy and negative energy EM fields. Rather, it is the change that occurs in the vacuum when the hole departs. It is a real change, but it is NOT the hole itself, nor is an observation of that change an observation of the departed hole.

Anyway, rightly or wrongly Dirac concluded that “the hole itself” would thus be observed as a positron. That is false, when one examines the process which is for a positronic change in the vacuum when the hole departs. In short, the conclusion should have been that the DEPARTED HOLE itself could not be directly observed, but that the change of the vacuum to ELIIMINATE a hole by replacing it with a filled hole would be observable as a positron.

So the present conventional theory seems very muddled in its treatment of the “Dirac hole”. Due to this, in my view the present researchers have “lost” dark energy and dark matter, by that Dirac-inspired erroneous conclusion that the hole is somehow a positron. It isn’t.

However, Mills has in fact rather extended the Dirac sea ELECTRON theory, to open up the Dirac sea to other kinds of holes and other kinds of negative mass-energy “particles”. I believe if he can get it all together well enough, and iron out any remaining wrinkles, he will have emerged with a tremendous expansion of the Dirac sea concept and its experimental and theoretical treatment. My view is that, if nature makes holes in the ambient vacuum the size of electrons, then it jolly well can also make holes that are some 1800 times bigger.

Out of all this, somehow, I believe there will eventually emerge a rather well-fitted experimentally-based model that finally does allow really practical engineering of the dark matter, dark energy, and practical antigravity. It will also obviously allow excess EM energy to be taken rather freely from the vacuum, thus resolving our present severe energy difficulties. By use of negative energy flows along a path containing iterative series impedances, in theory one can use a little negative energy generator powered by a flashlight battery to generate enough negative energy to power all the loads in New York City! If we used negative energy and designed our impedance loads to be powered by negative energy, we also would always experience an additional free negative energy gain (and real power gain) in the load itself, for each individual load.

Again, experimentally based work such as Mills work should be highly supported, and young doctoral candidates and post docs in good universities should also be funded and released to study these BlackPower processes, models, experiments, etc.

The real present barrier to a great new science of energy, antigravity, etc. is the strongly dogmatic insistence by most of our conventional scientific community that such a “release” to expand the models and experiments is against the sad old 1880’s CEM/EE model, and thus should be vigorously prohibited and suppressed.

In short, in my view organized science in many ways has now become its own worst enemy, implementing and enforcing old 1880s EM dogma rather than expanded EM science using the scientific method.

Best wishes,

Tom

---

Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 7:05 AM
To: Tom Bearden
Subject: Ken Rauen Explains Dr. Mill's Blacklightpower process

Good Morning Tom,

Thought you'd like to take a closer look at this piece of information peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Blacklight_Power

Ken Rauen explains it beautifully,

His statement: "When an atom at a high energy state (also called an excited state) falls to a lower level, energy is released. This usually occurs as a photon of light. The observed line spectra emissions of atoms corresponds to these transitions." incorporates your 'observable' [photon]

Ken Rauen is referring to the lowering of the 'ground state' of the hydrogen atom, thus the release of the [photon] 'observable' energy of the hydrogen atom.

The Hydrogen 'atom' "Since sub-quantum atoms are non-radiative, they are an explanation for "dark matter" that keeps galaxies together by gravity and not flying apart at the high rotational speeds of many galaxies." exhibits the characteristics [dark matter] [The ultraviolet line spectra of the sun are unexplained by classical QM. To explain the UV spectrum of the sun from hydrogen (the primary constituent of the sun), Mills proposed fractional quantum states, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5, and so on. These energy transitions fit the UV spectrum of the sun, hence the name, Blacklight Power. Since sub-quantum atoms are non-radiative, they are an explanation for "dark matter" that keeps galaxies together by gravity and not flying apart at the high rotational speeds of many galaxies.] of the 'non-observable' when they are in fractional quantum states, 1/2. 1/3, 1/4, 1/5.

Ken further states: "The energy released in these sub-ground state transitions is larger than any known chemical reaction and the Mills process was initially thought to be a cold fusion phenomenon. The energy level is not as great as nuclear reactions; it is intermediate to nuclear and chemical reaction energies. It is in a category by itself."

He concludes: "BLP has a terrific energy producing process that liberates heat in the 1000 degree F range, but it has chosen to first develop the hydrino technology into a new class of chemical compounds, as the hydrino is chemically reactive."

cheniere.org/correspondence/012206.htm

"As a result of the Aether Physics Model, the term "Aether" is once again brought into the scientific lexicon as space-time (or more accurately, space-resonance) is shown to include mass, charge, geometrical shapes, and is driven by a massive, dynamic Gforce. The Aether is clearly identified and shown to have an active part in maintaining the existence of the physical Universe.

Differences between the Aether Physics Model and the Standard Model of physics.

1. In the Aether Physics Model charge is always represented as a distributed charge (i.e. coul² instead of coul)

2. All subatomic particles are seen just as experiment and mathematics presents them, as primary angular momentum (two-dimensional matter); not as solid particles and not as waves. This eliminates wave/particle duality.

3. The photon in the Aether Physics Model is essentially an outward expanding electron and not a point particle. The outward expansion causes the photon to lose the electrostatic charge but retain its electromagnetic charge. The photon moves at the speed of light, thus causing the photon to appear as though it were in free fall and massless.

4. In the Aether Physics Model the electron and proton have two types of charge, electrostatic and electromagnetic. The electrostatic charge has a spherical angle and the electromagnetic charge has a steradian angle. The neutron and photon also have electromagnetic charge, but the neutron has a null electrostatic charge and the photon has no electrostatic charge.

5. The structure of the Aether is such that it appears there are two toroids spinning in opposite directions, which contributes to the structure of subatomic particles and atoms. This configuration allows for half-spin electromagnetic charges, which cover 360 degrees of arc. The half-spin, steradian electromagnetic charges of subatomic particles are attracted together according to the strong force law, which is similar to Coulomb's electrostatic force law.

6. In the APM the mass and electromagnetic properties of all subatomic particles always have the exact same mass to electromagnetic charge ratio. Even the Aether has the same mass to electromagnetic charge ratio.

7. In the Aether Physics Model, Aether (space-resonance) is seen as an essential component of reality. All physical matter exists within space-resonance and this space-resonance is dynamic, not lifeless or static.

8. The Aether Physics Model has a mathematically correct Unified Force Theory, the Standard Model does not.

9. The APM also acknowledges a conductance constant for free space, the Standard Model does not. This conductance constant is essential to understanding the true nature of the Quantum realm as it is directly responsible for producing electromagnetic charge.

10. The Aether Physics Model explains General Relativity Theory in terms of the electrostatic charge of the Aether and the strong charge of matter.

e² = 8pi * a * e.emax²

This replaces Albert Einstein's explanation as the equality between the space-time curvature tensor and the mass-energy tensor:

G = 8pi * T

Not only does the APM explanation explain why light bends around massive objects, but it also explains plasma physics."

www.quantumaetherdynamics.com/



There are four commonly known, fundamental dimensions; mass, charge, length, and frequency. Quantum matter has only two dimensions of length, that is, it only has surface characteristic. There is no quantum matter that is solid. It is the distance between surfaces that provide the third dimension of length producing “solid matter” as we perceive it at the macro level of existence.

We perceive time as normal and frequency as the reciprocal because subatomic onta move only in the forward dimension of time. In reality, the onta are acting like “time diodes”. What we really see is a pulsed forward motion of time, not unlike a rectified AC current produces pulsed DC current. Since all subatomic matter beats to the same pulse in forward time, time appears as linear to our perception.

Visualizing the forward and backward time, it is possible to see how time and space are curved such that distributed frequency appears as spherical and space appears as a loxodrome. But once again, this geometry can only be seen from beyond the material world (such as being visualized in our mind through meditation.) When the material world is viewed from within the material world, i.e. from the body’s senses, then we are viewing from half-spin perspective and see only three dimensions of space and one dimension of pulsed, linear time (normally called 4D reality.)

The presentation of time and space in terms of curvature implies that curved geometry is inherent to Aether. In the Aether Physics Model, the curved geometry of Aether is presented as a function of frequency squared. Frequency squared resolves to a sphere with a surface constant of 4p. In this sense, the spherical constant could be considered a “fifth dimension” in addition to mass, charge, length, and frequency.

When expressed in cgs units, permeability, permittivity, conductance, and rotating magnetic field (Aether unit) are expressed solely in terms of the 4p spherical constant and the speed of light. So it is shown that Aether is a function of curvature and motion, much like the ancient philosophers taught.

Not only can it be seen that the Aether is a function of spherical geometry and the speed of light, but the fact that charge can be expressed entirely in terms of the other three dimensions shows that charge is indeed a derived dimension. Strong charge is equal to angular momentum times Aether conductance.

The strong charge has half-spin, as the angular momentum that produces strong charge can only move in forward moving time. In order to convert strong charge steradian geometry to electrostatic spherical geometry, the strong charge must be multiplied by 4p. And since the elementary charge comes from a 1-spin Aether sphere, 2 must multiply the half-spin strong charge in order to be equal in spin to the elementary charge.

The fine structure constant is the proportion by which the strong charge must be multiplied in order to bring the elementary charge sphere and equivalent strong charge sphere into unity. So it can be seen that there is another conservation law of physics, it is the conservation of charge geometry.

The rotating magnetic field is not just a single magnetic field spinning in one direction. It is a bi-directional spin composed of two toroidal shaped electromagnetic charges spinning adjacent to each other, but in opposite directions. In the two-spin version of rotating magnetic field, it is also oscillating between forward and backward time.

There are two manifestations of the rotating magnetic field. There is the two-spin manifestation, which is the full Aether unit and has the geometrical constant of 16p2. Then there is the one-spin manifestation of rotating magnetic field, which applies when two onn bind together. One spin rotating magnetic field has a geometrical constant equal to the toroidal onn (4p2) times 2, because there are two oppositely spinning onta in a binding.

The bi-directional spinning toroids component of the equation are equal to the quantum measurement unit of double cardioid. The mass to strong charge ratio of the onn is the source of electromagnetism. The rotating magnetic field unit is therefore described as an electromagnetic double cardioidal spin, or rotating magnetic field."

www.16pi2.com/chapter_5_secrets_of_the_aether.htm

Wow, a lot to think about in this short review. First off, what first comes to mind is that someone else also has come to the same conclusion in regards to a two way flow of time. Secondly, if there is a two way flow of time then how do large scale "mediums" fit into such a paradigm? Fortunately, MM has the edge in defining CG and MI geometries as a first approximation that certainly takes this relationship beyond the speed of light. In this case of a dual time nature, the mediums would move in opposite directions and have polarity. So, then the next step is that such a medium flow must then demodulate into lower frequencies that maintain forward and reverse angular momentum, the regeneration of matter and antimatter, and gravity and antigravity. Obviously, we only see the effects of forward time, gravity, and only in rare circumstances do we see antigravity, levitation, cold energy, and other time dilation related effects. Why? If we finally can understand and answer correctly that question, then we will resolve many issues in physics and evolve our science and this civilization to an advanced technological level that would accelerate the FTL exploration of our universe.

John