- Thank you received: 0
Broken Circle
21 years 6 months ago #5864
by Mac
Replied by Mac on topic Reply from Dan McCoin
north,
Thanks for that clarification. Now I must ask you if you are familiar with the "Chiral Condensate"?
Thanks for that clarification. Now I must ask you if you are familiar with the "Chiral Condensate"?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
21 years 6 months ago #4501
by north
Replied by north on topic Reply from
mac
no i am not familiar with chiral condensate.but please tell me, i am willing to learn.
no i am not familiar with chiral condensate.but please tell me, i am willing to learn.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
21 years 6 months ago #5492
by Mac
Replied by Mac on topic Reply from Dan McCoin
north,
It is a name being given to what we formely have considered to be the "Vacuum or Voids" of space. It appears to be "Nothingness" but virtual particles routinely pop into and out of existance.
Since they don't really have a good handle on what it is yet let me suggest that you go online and search "Chiral Condensate Energy".
If is fasinating stuff.
It is a name being given to what we formely have considered to be the "Vacuum or Voids" of space. It appears to be "Nothingness" but virtual particles routinely pop into and out of existance.
Since they don't really have a good handle on what it is yet let me suggest that you go online and search "Chiral Condensate Energy".
If is fasinating stuff.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
21 years 6 months ago #5680
by north
Replied by north on topic Reply from
mark
subject black holes
i don't believe they can exist here is why.
if i put a shere surrounded by water and cause it to rotate it would not produce a hole in it's vortex,why because it needs a surface to produce a hole,it will be always filled with water.now if i move this vortex closer to the surface a hole hole will be produced but if i also move the sphere closer to the surface it will stop this,it needs space.
now in a galaxy there is no vortex at the top or bottom of it,the vortex (but really its rotation ) comes from the middle,and thats where the rotation is.so how can a black hole be produced at the centre of a galaxy and be caused by a rotation? if we look at a galaxy edge on there is the stars and then there is half sphere above and below a rotation,there is no vortex but rotation,vortex is not in the in the centre of anything! it is either above or below,but rotation can exist in the middle, this means to me that the rotation must be moving away not inward,as HALTON suggests.there is no vortex at the centre of our galaxy!!
subject black holes
i don't believe they can exist here is why.
if i put a shere surrounded by water and cause it to rotate it would not produce a hole in it's vortex,why because it needs a surface to produce a hole,it will be always filled with water.now if i move this vortex closer to the surface a hole hole will be produced but if i also move the sphere closer to the surface it will stop this,it needs space.
now in a galaxy there is no vortex at the top or bottom of it,the vortex (but really its rotation ) comes from the middle,and thats where the rotation is.so how can a black hole be produced at the centre of a galaxy and be caused by a rotation? if we look at a galaxy edge on there is the stars and then there is half sphere above and below a rotation,there is no vortex but rotation,vortex is not in the in the centre of anything! it is either above or below,but rotation can exist in the middle, this means to me that the rotation must be moving away not inward,as HALTON suggests.there is no vortex at the centre of our galaxy!!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
21 years 1 month ago #6560
by natyd
Replied by natyd on topic Reply from nathan davies
rite 1st time i ave repyled 2 ne thing b4, but i ave read most of wots been said, u r all basin things on human knowledge which are equations n ave unknowns in them, wot r u basing ur knoledge on?? wot we call "facts", they mite just be assumptions, i am only 14 but i ave a lot of noledge on real things n i aint no how, but we mite be just basing all our thinking on sumthing that mite be rong, it mite just be coincidence, that things work out, or not, but we dnt no that either, knolege is only an assumption or based on things that have fallen in 2 places conviently, its jus sumthing i ave been thinkin bout, i aint no much equations n stuff but i ave a lot of common sense[]
NaTaN
NaTaN
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
21 years 1 month ago #6561
by natyd
Replied by natyd on topic Reply from nathan davies
rite 1st time i ave repyled 2 ne thing b4, but i ave read most of wots been said, u r all basin things on human knowledge which are equations n ave unknowns in them, wot r u basing ur knoledge on?? wot we call "facts", they mite just be assumptions, i am only 14 but i ave a lot of noledge on real things n i aint no how, but we mite be just basing all our thinking on sumthing that mite be rong, it mite just be coincidence, that things work out, or not, but we dnt no that either, knolege is only an assumption or based on things that have fallen in 2 places conviently, its jus sumthing i ave been thinkin bout, i aint no much equations n stuff but i ave a lot of common sense[^]
NaTaN
NaTaN
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.404 seconds