- Thank you received: 0
True Meta Science Needs No Measurments,
19 years 9 months ago #11015
by DWB
Replied by DWB on topic Reply from Duane Brown
space is all there is. I agree with that completely.
Duane Brown
Duane Brown
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 years 9 months ago #13150
by Messiah
Replied by Messiah on topic Reply from Jack McNally
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by DWB</i>
<br />space is all there is. I agree with that completely.
Duane Brown
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Define space.
<br />space is all there is. I agree with that completely.
Duane Brown
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Define space.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 years 8 months ago #12606
by DWB
Replied by DWB on topic Reply from Duane Brown
Messiah:
I prefer to leave space undefined; however, I'll take a stab at it.
It is the “stuff” the universe is made of.
The stuff, the whole stuff, and nothing but the stuff.
Duane Brown
I prefer to leave space undefined; however, I'll take a stab at it.
It is the “stuff” the universe is made of.
The stuff, the whole stuff, and nothing but the stuff.
Duane Brown
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 years 3 months ago #14195
by Meta
Replied by Meta on topic Reply from Robert Grace
Deliver to me, a spoonful of space, since it exists.
Meta
Meta
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 years 3 months ago #14345
by Skarp
Replied by Skarp on topic Reply from jim jim
A scoop of Corn Flakes with milk Is a spoonful of space. The link here is it's geometric. There is no difference between space and matter when it comes down to geometric embodiment, which is what the universe represents.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 years 3 months ago #14154
by PhilJ
Replied by PhilJ on topic Reply from Philip Janes
solipsism
In our minds, space is a multidimensional matrix in which we model substances and objects, attribute properties to them, and apply rules of behavior. When our simulation fails to accurately predict our sensory inputs, we make adjustments to the model. Failure to predict danger often prevents an individual from procreating; so any genetic adaptation that individual had tends to become extinct.
Evolution has apparently hardwired the human brain to mirror its sensory inputs in a virtual space-time of four dimensions. We don't truly know if the sensory inputs are caused by an external world of four dimensions; we only know that our four-dimensional virtual space-time has been adequate, thus far, to ensure survival of our species. I wonder if a whale's virtual universe has only four dimensions.
Advancements in science have vastly expanded our sensory inputs. How do we know those inputs are real? We don't truly know that our bodies are real; we only know that our sensory inputs are compatible with the image we have of our bodies within the virtual universe we have created in our minds. The same can be said of our scientific instruments.
Going on the assumption that our instruments are as real as our bodies, we discover new sensory inputs that our mental simulations failed to accurately predict. So we modify the virtual model and the rules. Some scientists have suggested that four dimensions are not adequate to contain their new virtual models; some have postulated space-time with twenty some dimensions.
Some of the models, as TVF is so fond of pointing out, are purely mathematical constructs, which the human brain is incapable of simulating. Our electronic computers have no such limitation; they can be programmed to model a space-time of many dimensions. If such a computer model can predict the input received from our extended senses more accurately than any model of only four dimensions, then perhaps we have become obsolete. Silicon based intelligent life may be the next step in evolution; we have created our own successor. Will it see fit to keep us as pets?
In our minds, space is a multidimensional matrix in which we model substances and objects, attribute properties to them, and apply rules of behavior. When our simulation fails to accurately predict our sensory inputs, we make adjustments to the model. Failure to predict danger often prevents an individual from procreating; so any genetic adaptation that individual had tends to become extinct.
Evolution has apparently hardwired the human brain to mirror its sensory inputs in a virtual space-time of four dimensions. We don't truly know if the sensory inputs are caused by an external world of four dimensions; we only know that our four-dimensional virtual space-time has been adequate, thus far, to ensure survival of our species. I wonder if a whale's virtual universe has only four dimensions.
Advancements in science have vastly expanded our sensory inputs. How do we know those inputs are real? We don't truly know that our bodies are real; we only know that our sensory inputs are compatible with the image we have of our bodies within the virtual universe we have created in our minds. The same can be said of our scientific instruments.
Going on the assumption that our instruments are as real as our bodies, we discover new sensory inputs that our mental simulations failed to accurately predict. So we modify the virtual model and the rules. Some scientists have suggested that four dimensions are not adequate to contain their new virtual models; some have postulated space-time with twenty some dimensions.
Some of the models, as TVF is so fond of pointing out, are purely mathematical constructs, which the human brain is incapable of simulating. Our electronic computers have no such limitation; they can be programmed to model a space-time of many dimensions. If such a computer model can predict the input received from our extended senses more accurately than any model of only four dimensions, then perhaps we have become obsolete. Silicon based intelligent life may be the next step in evolution; we have created our own successor. Will it see fit to keep us as pets?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.336 seconds