- Thank you received: 0
MM Explanation for Quantum Entaglement
18 years 9 months ago #14604
by jrich
Reply from was created by jrich
Ok, its been a week. I'm going to assume that TVF is too busy to post a response rather than doesn't have one. Would anyone else who is familiar with MM care to take the time to answer my query?
JR
JR
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Larry Burford
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
18 years 9 months ago #14606
by Larry Burford
Replied by Larry Burford on topic Reply from Larry Burford
I think Tom is out of town for a few days. MM has not focused on things in the quantum world until very recently and so far has little to say about it. I have seen Tom say that one aspect of it (ftl phenomena, such as the seemingly instataneous connection between two entangled particles) is neither a surprize to nor a problem for MM.
LB
LB
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 years 9 months ago #17105
by dholeman
Replied by dholeman on topic Reply from Don Holeman
What are quantum entangled photons? Sounds like jargon. Do you have a citation?
No great thing was ever created suddenly - Epictitus
No great thing was ever created suddenly - Epictitus
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Larry Burford
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
18 years 9 months ago #17305
by Larry Burford
Replied by Larry Burford on topic Reply from Larry Burford
Don,
According to certain interpretations (based on quantum mechanical theory) of certain experiments , particle properties such as spin can become coupled or entangled when two particles are created (or manipulated in certain other ways) under the right conditions.
Changing the spin (or other entangled property) on one of them also immediately and/or instantaneously changes the spin on the other one. Even if the particles are separated after entanglemant has been established.
This effect is not a function of the separation distance (again, according to QM). One nanometer or 10 billion lightyears, it's all the same.
Oh, and it can *not* be used for signaling. Why? Because <u>information</u> can't propagate faster than light.
LB
(Don't look at me that way - it's not my idea, I'm just repeating the story as I heard it.)
According to certain interpretations (based on quantum mechanical theory) of certain experiments , particle properties such as spin can become coupled or entangled when two particles are created (or manipulated in certain other ways) under the right conditions.
Changing the spin (or other entangled property) on one of them also immediately and/or instantaneously changes the spin on the other one. Even if the particles are separated after entanglemant has been established.
This effect is not a function of the separation distance (again, according to QM). One nanometer or 10 billion lightyears, it's all the same.
Oh, and it can *not* be used for signaling. Why? Because <u>information</u> can't propagate faster than light.
LB
(Don't look at me that way - it's not my idea, I'm just repeating the story as I heard it.)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 years 9 months ago #14644
by jrich
Replied by jrich on topic Reply from
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>
<br />Oh, and it can *not* be used for signaling. Why? Because <u>information</u> can't propagate faster than light.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Actually, information (such as spin or polarity) does in fact travel faster than light (hence, the "spooky action at a distance"), its just that this information that is received is of no value for encoding other information (signalling) without knowing the corresponding property of the other quantum entangled particle. Since this corresponding property information cannot be transmitted by other means faster than the speed of light, quantum entanglement cannot be used to send signals faster than lightspeed.
JR
<br />Oh, and it can *not* be used for signaling. Why? Because <u>information</u> can't propagate faster than light.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Actually, information (such as spin or polarity) does in fact travel faster than light (hence, the "spooky action at a distance"), its just that this information that is received is of no value for encoding other information (signalling) without knowing the corresponding property of the other quantum entangled particle. Since this corresponding property information cannot be transmitted by other means faster than the speed of light, quantum entanglement cannot be used to send signals faster than lightspeed.
JR
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tvanflandern
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
18 years 9 months ago #17169
by tvanflandern
Replied by tvanflandern on topic Reply from Tom Van Flandern
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by jrich</i>
<br />hence, the "spooky action at a distance"<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">In MM, near-instantaneous FTL propagation of real information via gravitons is routine. So it would not lead anyone to think of it as "spooky". -|Tom|-
<br />hence, the "spooky action at a distance"<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">In MM, near-instantaneous FTL propagation of real information via gravitons is routine. So it would not lead anyone to think of it as "spooky". -|Tom|-
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.570 seconds