- Thank you received: 0
Interesting new book
- Larry Burford
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
11 years 6 months ago #13929
by Larry Burford
Reply from Larry Burford was created by Larry Burford
I was amazed by the analysis of the great pyramid as a possible proceeing plant for reactor grade fissionable material. But evidence is not proof, and there is an issue that seems to trump this whole meme.
Fission power is almost ideal for interplanetary propulsion systems (assuming great engineers, strong insurance companies and politicians kept in prison where they belong).
But it is totally inadequate for interstellar propulsion. Even fusion power is on the whimpy side (kind of like the way chemical power is for interplanetary propulsion - it can do the job, but it is ultra slow, very expensive and therefore dangerous as hell).
Antimatter power is needed for for anything more than timid, un-'manned' exploration of the stars. And even then it will take a while to go anywhere.
***
So, why would these space aliens be using fission powered vehicles?
(It would be so embarrassing: You drive a WHAT?! HAR! HAR! HAR! HAR!)
***
We really really need some kind of hyperspace or subspace or warp drive. Sigh.
LB
Fission power is almost ideal for interplanetary propulsion systems (assuming great engineers, strong insurance companies and politicians kept in prison where they belong).
But it is totally inadequate for interstellar propulsion. Even fusion power is on the whimpy side (kind of like the way chemical power is for interplanetary propulsion - it can do the job, but it is ultra slow, very expensive and therefore dangerous as hell).
Antimatter power is needed for for anything more than timid, un-'manned' exploration of the stars. And even then it will take a while to go anywhere.
***
So, why would these space aliens be using fission powered vehicles?
(It would be so embarrassing: You drive a WHAT?! HAR! HAR! HAR! HAR!)
***
We really really need some kind of hyperspace or subspace or warp drive. Sigh.
LB
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Michael Collins
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
11 years 6 months ago #24157
by Michael Collins
Replied by Michael Collins on topic Reply from Michael Collins
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>
<br />I was amazed by the analysis of the great pyramid as a possible proceeing plant for reactor grade fissionable material. But evidence is not proof, and there is an issue that seems to trump this whole meme.
Fission power is almost ideal for interplanetary propulsion systems (assuming great engineers, strong insurance companies and politicians kept in prison where they belong).
But it is totally inadequate for interstellar propulsion. Even fusion power is on the whimpy side (kind of like the way chemical power is for interplanetary propulsion - it can do the job, but it is ultra slow, very expensive and therefore dangerous as hell).
Antimatter power is needed for for anything more than timid, un-'manned' exploration of the stars. And even then it will take a while to go anywhere.
***
So, why would these space aliens be using fission powered vehicles?
(It would be so embarrassing: You drive a WHAT?! HAR! HAR! HAR! HAR!)
***
We really really need some kind of hyperspace or subspace or warp drive. Sigh.
LB
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
<br />I was amazed by the analysis of the great pyramid as a possible proceeing plant for reactor grade fissionable material. But evidence is not proof, and there is an issue that seems to trump this whole meme.
Fission power is almost ideal for interplanetary propulsion systems (assuming great engineers, strong insurance companies and politicians kept in prison where they belong).
But it is totally inadequate for interstellar propulsion. Even fusion power is on the whimpy side (kind of like the way chemical power is for interplanetary propulsion - it can do the job, but it is ultra slow, very expensive and therefore dangerous as hell).
Antimatter power is needed for for anything more than timid, un-'manned' exploration of the stars. And even then it will take a while to go anywhere.
***
So, why would these space aliens be using fission powered vehicles?
(It would be so embarrassing: You drive a WHAT?! HAR! HAR! HAR! HAR!)
***
We really really need some kind of hyperspace or subspace or warp drive. Sigh.
LB
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Michael Collins
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
11 years 6 months ago #13939
by Michael Collins
Replied by Michael Collins on topic Reply from Michael Collins
well, as I understand it he wasn't even suggesting the Egyptians were aliens. They were using nuclear power in the pyramid for an earthly purpose. i guess you have to read it - a complex story but it all makes some sort of sense. Mike
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Larry Burford
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
11 years 6 months ago #13940
by Larry Burford
Replied by Larry Burford on topic Reply from Larry Burford
We may not be talking about the same article. In the one I read (in the Meta Research Bulletin) the Egyptians were hired laborers and their employers, presumably, needed to refuel their ships.
But if some early humans found a way to produce fissionable material back then (and knew enough to stand a few feet away from it) it did us no good because the tech was lost. Perhaps because they did NOT know enough to stand a few feet away?
Like the first steam turbine in 70 AD. (Another Egyptian invention, by the way.)
But both have been regained. Imagine where we would be if either or both had not been lost.
LB
But if some early humans found a way to produce fissionable material back then (and knew enough to stand a few feet away from it) it did us no good because the tech was lost. Perhaps because they did NOT know enough to stand a few feet away?
Like the first steam turbine in 70 AD. (Another Egyptian invention, by the way.)
But both have been regained. Imagine where we would be if either or both had not been lost.
LB
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Gregg Wilson
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
11 years 6 months ago #13931
by Gregg Wilson
Replied by Gregg Wilson on topic Reply from Gregg Wilson
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>
<br />We may not be talking about the same article. In the one I read (in the Meta Research Bulletin) the Egyptians were hired laborers and their employers, presumably, needed to refuel their ships.
But if some early humans found a way to produce fissionable material back then (and knew enough to stand a few feet away from it) it did us no good because the tech was lost. Perhaps because they did NOT know enough to stand a few feet away?
Like the first steam turbine in 70 AD. (Another Egyptian invention, by the way.)
But both have been regained. Imagine where we would be if either or both had not been lost.
LB
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
<br />We may not be talking about the same article. In the one I read (in the Meta Research Bulletin) the Egyptians were hired laborers and their employers, presumably, needed to refuel their ships.
But if some early humans found a way to produce fissionable material back then (and knew enough to stand a few feet away from it) it did us no good because the tech was lost. Perhaps because they did NOT know enough to stand a few feet away?
Like the first steam turbine in 70 AD. (Another Egyptian invention, by the way.)
But both have been regained. Imagine where we would be if either or both had not been lost.
LB
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Gregg Wilson
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
11 years 6 months ago #13941
by Gregg Wilson
Replied by Gregg Wilson on topic Reply from Gregg Wilson
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>
<br />We may not be talking about the same article. In the one I read (in the Meta Research Bulletin) the Egyptians were hired laborers and their employers, presumably, needed to refuel their ships.
But if some early humans found a way to produce fissionable material back then (and knew enough to stand a few feet away from it) it did us no good because the tech was lost. Perhaps because they did NOT know enough to stand a few feet away?
Like the first steam turbine in 70 AD. (Another Egyptian invention, by the way.)
But both have been regained. Imagine where we would be if either or both had not been lost.
LB
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
<br />We may not be talking about the same article. In the one I read (in the Meta Research Bulletin) the Egyptians were hired laborers and their employers, presumably, needed to refuel their ships.
But if some early humans found a way to produce fissionable material back then (and knew enough to stand a few feet away from it) it did us no good because the tech was lost. Perhaps because they did NOT know enough to stand a few feet away?
Like the first steam turbine in 70 AD. (Another Egyptian invention, by the way.)
But both have been regained. Imagine where we would be if either or both had not been lost.
LB
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.850 seconds