- Thank you received: 0
Electric Astronomy Book
- jimiproton
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Premium Member
Less
More
22 years 1 month ago #3291
by jimiproton
Reply from James Balderston was created by jimiproton
It sounds like the best explanation of the "supercluster" phenonmenon to date.
The four forces, perhaps, are a single force in different manifestations. Scale, and time, are dimentions in the MM. A rate of time progression would bring the forces in a harmony at some point.
Would this harmony be measure of scale (and consequent time-progression)?
I am a linguist, studied in the humanities, and therefore not as qualified to deal in the hard sciences as many others in these forums. Never-the-less, Agorabasta has proposed the following ideaa:
quote:
_______________________________________________________________________________
One can also imagine mutually inpenetrable time scales, e.g. - any finite duration on one scale is infinite on another. The infamous speed of light appears as an example of such barrier of scales, that's if one is a relativist; or just a scale barrier for the EM processes.
_______________________________________________________________________________
The EM processes may have barriers along certain orientations, producing filament effects: ie. supercluster formations.
There is another interesting EM limitation:
Our neighborhood of the universe has a polarity that causes
all photons travelling along an axis pointing towards the constellations Sextans to rotate in transit once every several billion light-years (sorry, exact figure not on hand). This is availabel at www.enterprisemission.com .
It points to the same filament-structure of the universe.
The four forces, perhaps, are a single force in different manifestations. Scale, and time, are dimentions in the MM. A rate of time progression would bring the forces in a harmony at some point.
Would this harmony be measure of scale (and consequent time-progression)?
I am a linguist, studied in the humanities, and therefore not as qualified to deal in the hard sciences as many others in these forums. Never-the-less, Agorabasta has proposed the following ideaa:
quote:
_______________________________________________________________________________
One can also imagine mutually inpenetrable time scales, e.g. - any finite duration on one scale is infinite on another. The infamous speed of light appears as an example of such barrier of scales, that's if one is a relativist; or just a scale barrier for the EM processes.
_______________________________________________________________________________
The EM processes may have barriers along certain orientations, producing filament effects: ie. supercluster formations.
There is another interesting EM limitation:
Our neighborhood of the universe has a polarity that causes
all photons travelling along an axis pointing towards the constellations Sextans to rotate in transit once every several billion light-years (sorry, exact figure not on hand). This is availabel at www.enterprisemission.com .
It points to the same filament-structure of the universe.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
21 years 7 months ago #5278
by Jeremy
Replied by Jeremy on topic Reply from
Finally got around to getting a copy of Dr. Laszlo's book "The Electric Universe" to read. Not being a solar astronomer I cannot adequately state the critical position against his hypothesis but can only describe my own amateur impression of his concept. Fully 90% of the book is devoted to discussing the forces powering the Sun and its near term results for us. Dr.Laszlo believes that the core of the Sun is basically unstable and that this is the cause of the 11 year sunspot cycle. In the first two years of the cycle chunks of the core explode off into the surrounding material, cool off and drop back down over the next 9 years. Sunspots are then the result of vortices caused by this process. Dr.Laszlo believes that the solar wind is the result of electrostatic repulsion caused by thermal charge separation inside the Sun. Another large chunk of the book is the justification for a theory of solar climate modeling that he uses to predict our climate future. The future is somewhat unsettling, he predicts a very large warming cycle that will peak sometime around the year 2040-2050. I am sure the standard astronomical community will regard his book as errant nonsense but I found it to be very compelling errant nonsense. My summary doesn't begin to provide the sufficient evidence that a reading of his 700pg work requires. His erupting core model certainly ties in well with TVF's suggestion of fission being the origin of the planets. I have read many renegade theoretical works and I find this to be one of the more serious ones. I hope TVF gets an opportunity to read this book someday if he hasn't already.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.610 seconds