Continental Drift Contradictions (CDC)

This particular event probably did not cause anything on Earth that might be referred to as a "super huge extra gigantic impact". In fact, it probably didn't cause anything more than "several pretty big whacks and a boat-load of little ones".

But there is evidence suggesting about six planetary explosions in the history of our solar system ...

This information might cause you to re-figure your time line, but that is one of the ways new theories advance.

LB

One of my CDC noises may relate to that 3.2 myr eph event: Only one impact crater is officially recognised in Tasmania, the Darwin crater near Darwin, a mining ghost town in Western Tasmania near Queenstown, but I saw 4 more recent craters in satellite photos and 1:20,000 resolution maps when I was mapping 100s of crustal "serms" (4.05-12) in Tasmania, 100s of mantle serms globally, 1997-8, judged all 4 of them to have came in low from the NNW, all parallel, so probably in the one shower.

I never made a fuss about those pretty obvious impacts, may not even have written them down, because I saw them as noise, a distraction from my pursuit of a huge, probably super huge impact . . . one of many examples of the "one-man-bandsman [me, having] to leave many important things undone."

I only have access to the maps now, not the satellite photos anymore, so can only supply UGR coordinates, descriptions:
55GDP121875, Crater Lake 1:20,000 resolution Tasmap 4038
55GDP245222, Scoparia Lake 1:20,000 resolution Tasmap 4232
55GDP245222, King William Plains 1:20,000 resolution Tasmap 4232
55GDP321893, 1st of 3 lakes 1:20,000 resolution Tasmap 4228
55GDP322889, 2nd of 3 lakes 1:20,000 resolution Tasmap 4228
55GDP323883, 3rd of 3 lakes 1:20,000 resolution Tasmap 4228

Tasmaps can be ordered from tasmaps@dpiwe.tas.gov.au or www.dpiwe.tas.gov.au . As I explain in 5.4 page 10-11, Geology has been biased against impact interpretation, so I am quite sure I'd find many other new craters beyond Tasmania if I looked. I am an unusually perceptive physicist. Those possibly eph-consistent Tasmanian impacts, consistent with dispersed hemispheric impacts centred on SE Asia, indicate that this may be worth doing, as a way of corroborating eph.

LB, I just now Googled on Dating of Impact Events and got 106,000,000 items, and the first item on the first page looked interesting.

That 3.2 myr ago eph event is fairly accurately dated, maybe some of the other eph events as well, so it looks like some good eph science could be done by Dating of Impact Events. Mass extinction events (such as PTB) are already fairly accurately dated and most of these could be assumed to be indicators of huge, super huge impacts also.