Structures... or geology??

More
22 years 4 months ago #2511 by rhw007
Here is link to original MSSS page for an anomalous area with possible objects of 'suspicious' origin in the lower left of this image.

www.msss.com/moc_gallery/ab1_m04/images/AB108405.html

It's been around and debated for awhile in many places. I think it is certainly a top 10 of 'artificial' looking things.

Course I also think :

members.tripod.com/rhw007/csc_2001/smoki...ramid_of_cydonia.htm

is an artificial construct that is currently active. The THEMIS images could confirm or refute that hypothesis if they would but release the data.

Let's taunt a Billionaire to Mars ! ! ! Beats Begging.

Think out there act down here... NOW ! ! ! Have YOU ??

Give a High School kid a reason to care...a spacewalk.
Teach 'em a lesson in teamwork.
Teach 'em a lesson in humanity.

Bob... ;-{)

home.thirdage.com/Teaching/rhw007/index.html

members.tripod.com/rhw007/

communities.msn.com/JPLMarsExploration


Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
22 years 4 months ago #2513 by tvanflandern
>[Rob]: I was just wondering if anyone can point out more convincing images that perhaps are new to me, or have any reasonable interpretations other than structures.... or for that matter, better images/ reasons to believe there are buildings, etc. on Mars.

Biases are strong and run both ways. That is why we cannot trust "what an image looks like" to mean much. The team of scientists responsible for the "Artificial structures on Mars" presentation on this web site (see "Featured Articles" in left box on home page) has looked carefully for other clues, such as before-the-fact predictions, context, and interrelationships between images.

The bottom line is that it does not matter how artificial an image looks -- it can still be natural. And it doesn't matter how easily a feature can be explained by geology or other natural processes -- If it fulfills a priori predictions that distinguish it from chance, then it is not of natural origin. To cling to a prior opinion in the face of objective contrary evidence is just bias -- either way. -|Tom|-

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
22 years 4 months ago #2614 by Gregg
Replied by Gregg on topic Reply from Gregg Wilson

Also, there are more than a few images that show what surely appear to be water, triple point be danged;

The "lakes" are probably aqueous but not pure water. For instance, a nitrite - nitrate - water solution could have a freezing point as much as 70 Fahrenheit degrees below pure water. The apparent observational fact is that of a liquid. There are hundreds of candidates, when non-pure solutions are considered.

Gregg Wilson

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
22 years 4 months ago #2553 by keith
Replied by keith on topic Reply from Keith Laney
Hi Tom,
I have several I think are pretty excellent.
Here's one of my latest.
<img src=" server2044.virtualave.net/bullitt/e02-00373C1structure-art.jpg " border=0>
Whole bunch more where that came from.
Notice the angularity of the blocks on that rise.
BTW, nice BBS!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.431 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum