Planet of Art..

Thanks RD,

Unlike you , I'm not thinking trees though -- just tampering.. for instance...(what they covering up over here ???)
The fact that something is covered up in an image is no longer a question for me..

Your input on the greyscale issues are well received and appreciated..

hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/PSP_005571_0950

Trinket, could you tell us a little about your "tampering" theory? I'm curious about this last image, and how it ties in. Yes, I can see underneath the haze as to what it "might" be, but we're filling between very few blanks on this one. Alot depends upon whether or not we're looking for humanoid shapes or any kind of creature shapes. If it's humanoid, I think I see what you're posting, but there's a non-humanoid in there also, equally visible (once you have the knack). One of the points I've always made about pareidolia is that as soon as we open the door to cartoon character, kilroy faces, creatures from the Black Lagoon, Darth Vaders and the like, it gets real easy to fabricate something. The only thing that makes it hard to make the pareidolia claim is humanoid with no features missing.

rd

rd, I just liked that one for the art to be honest.. It's not a great image as "proof" goes..

But the proof is in the fact that there is no area of Mars that is "natural" none ,zero, nada..
I will try to answer your tampering question in another post as it really covers much to much..
Mariner 4 - Mariner 9, the Viking orbiter and lander missions, Mars Pathfinder, Mars Global Surveyor, Mars Odyssey, and the Mars Exploration Rovers Hubble etc...

As far as the Vague Art there is always more than meets the eye ..


I like the vague art as it looks really great when displayed on a wall from a distance..

Heres a clue as to my thinking RD ,

<font color="limegreen"><font size="5">Question 1a
Mariner 4 Launched November 1964
Why mariner 4 so blurry ? </font id="size5"></font id="limegreen">



<font color="limegreen"><font size="5">Question 1b
Did the u2 have better optics in november 1962 ?
u2 cruising altitude 70,000 feet </font id="size5"></font id="limegreen">







<font color="limegreen"><font size="5">Question 2</font id="size5"></font id="limegreen">

Do you think there might be a reason why they didn't show mars in the globe form here ?
<font color="limegreen"><font size="5">I do</font id="size5"></font id="limegreen">
Mars Global Surveyor
Mars Orbiter Camera




<font color="limegreen"><font size="5">Question 3</font id="size5"></font id="limegreen">

When Mars is in Hubble range ,what are the chances of a planet wide duststorm ? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Trinket, I saw that U2 comparison a while back, but I don't remember whether or not it turned out to be an apples to apples comparison. Seems like it wasn't. As a matter of fact, I'd bet you can find some modern day spy images from us or the Israelis that would blow the doors off of anything we've seen out of NASA. Only thing is that I don't know what that proves.

rd