Nefertiti's Family

Here's another mosaic that passes my subjective probability threshhold for artificiality; the famous "Scullface," (AB108403), first noted I believe by JP Levasseur and HW Crater. First image is for north orientation. Second is enhanced and colorized for easier viewing.





It ocurred to me that when I posted the "Crownface" and pointed downward to "north" that it might be confusing to some readers. This cropped image is of the Crownface (M0203051) as it appears in the Map Projected image. Notice that the face is upside down in this image, and north is "up," as it is in all Map Projected images on the MSSS website. ("North arrow" is for general direction only.)

A reasonable conclusion is that of the four faces I posted to indicate N/S orientation, the "Crownface" is the only one that is "south oriented" (more or less). That is, relative to the present pole position of Mars, of course.



Neil

Hi again everyone,

On a different note, I was looking again at the equalized version of the "warriors" scene and I noticed another face. And this one, in fact, is a frontal view and has symmetry. Here is what I am looking at:



And here is the equalized version where I first noticed it:



The nose, bridge, eyebrows and eye-sockets are pretty well defined. This is more evidence for artificiality of the Nefertiti profiles as well as this set of profiles. While I haven't changed my inclination towards a natural origin, the more of these faces that appear in the same strip as Nefertiti, the stronger is the artificiality hypothesis. The fact that this new face is not a profile, but a frontal view, supports the claim even more, I think.

And here's the original key for the warriors (and woman) I posted, for new people who might have missed it the first time. And, incidentally, the reason there is a split down the middle is because this scene was created by piecing together two of the Nefertiti MGS strips of adjascent areas that were slightly different angles (see the earlier posts in this thread for a full explanation and more images).



Emanuel

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by emanuel</i>
<br />And here's the original key for the warriors (and woman) I posted, for new people who might have missed it the first time.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

There's another face in the headpiece of the "woman". I'll post it, if you can't see it.

rd

I just discovered that the essential images pertaining to this topic have been removed or lost. Therefore I'm posting a few of the most important so the record will not be lost. Most of the dialogue will be self explanitory by referring to the following images,

M0305549 Profile Image.



E0501429 PI.



E0501429 First Family.



Family histogram adjusted.



Family key freehand enhanced.



Neil

Here is a little bit of objective support for artificial structures on Mars. I just spent 16 days in Beijing, China on engineering meetings. We had to do the usual pilgrimmage to the Great Wall. A lot of work to build but no evidence of high technology. However, we visited a mausoleum for a Ming emperor who reigned from 1370 to 1430 AD. Being an engineer, I looked for evidence of technology and most certainly found it.

Within the mausoleum, there are gigantic pillars which hold up the ceiling. Each pillar was made from a tree trunk. The pillars were about 4-1/2 in diameter and about 50 feet tall. They were perfectly round and perfectly straight. Close examination showed that they had been turned on a lathe. I would estimate the pillar weight at 25 metric tons. Lathes of this size and capacity were not developed in Europe and America until just prior to World War One. And even then, I am not aware of any curent indutrial lathe that would be at least 60 feet long with a 5 foot throw across the centerline. These pillars could not have been placed into a lathe and cut by manpower or even horsepower. Possibly waterpower, but I doubt it. This was all done in about 1400 AD.

The Chinese engineer was very sincere and a bit naive. He stated that the God who made the mausoleum came down from the sky. This is hardly communist propaganda. (In fact, the Chinese make lousy communists, they are all business oriented.)

I have always been lukewarm about Zecharia Sitchin and his general theme. However, seeing is believing, and I will concede this particular case to Mr. Sitchin.

Gregg Wilson

We use sex to sell just about everything (including sex). I doubt that our hypothetical Martians would have been any less sophisticated.

Has anyone else noticed that if you let your mind wander in that particular direction while looking at these images, a few of them suddenly shift to explicit, um, explicitness?

LB