- Thank you received: 0
T or E
- neilderosa
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
18 years 4 months ago #8928
by neilderosa
Replied by neilderosa on topic Reply from Neil DeRosa
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 years 4 months ago #8932
by emanuel
Replied by emanuel on topic Reply from Emanuel Sferios
Please post keys alongside of the original. Pretty please.
Emanuel
Emanuel
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- neilderosa
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
18 years 4 months ago #16295
by neilderosa
Replied by neilderosa on topic Reply from Neil DeRosa
I'll do it soon Eman. And you didn't answer <b><u>My</u></b> question. ("Where's she from?" ID #) It works both ways my friend.
Neil
Neil
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- neilderosa
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
18 years 4 months ago #8933
by neilderosa
Replied by neilderosa on topic Reply from Neil DeRosa
I want to return to a mechanical looking object posted recently:
"Wrecked Ship," M0202913, and here's the link for it.
www.msss.com/moc_gallery/ab1_m04/images/M0202913.html
Here is the same image numbered and a key noting what I think each number may be, (left/right orientation is how we see it):
1- dome bridge, 2- left wing, and shadow of it, 3- broken off nose cone or light, 4- attached nose cone or light, 5- open cylinder end and shadow of inside ship, 6- line of rear end of cylinder hull and right wing, 7- square opening or window on square rear of hull, 8- vertical tail wing. The only problem is that the shadows seem to be falling wrong, compared to rest of strip and time of day in this map projected image strip, indicating it may be a fake. Also suspicious is that measuring with a ruler, the cylinder is about 300 meters diameter--very big for a ship?
Neil
"Wrecked Ship," M0202913, and here's the link for it.
www.msss.com/moc_gallery/ab1_m04/images/M0202913.html
Here is the same image numbered and a key noting what I think each number may be, (left/right orientation is how we see it):
1- dome bridge, 2- left wing, and shadow of it, 3- broken off nose cone or light, 4- attached nose cone or light, 5- open cylinder end and shadow of inside ship, 6- line of rear end of cylinder hull and right wing, 7- square opening or window on square rear of hull, 8- vertical tail wing. The only problem is that the shadows seem to be falling wrong, compared to rest of strip and time of day in this map projected image strip, indicating it may be a fake. Also suspicious is that measuring with a ruler, the cylinder is about 300 meters diameter--very big for a ship?
Neil
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 years 4 months ago #15990
by Gregg
Replied by Gregg on topic Reply from Gregg Wilson
Also suspicious is that measuring with a ruler, the cylinder is about 300 meters diameter--very big for a ship?
Neil
[/quote]
Since Mars has about 1/3 gravity of Earth, 300 meters width is not unreasonable. Our large ships can be 100 meters wide (aircraft carriers, oil tankers). However, very long term, Mars would have been a dessicated moon like our Moon. Perhaps an EPH downloaded a very large amount of water. Given the current topography, Mars would be 1/2 land (southern hemisphere) and 1/2 ocean (northern hemisphere). Would have been very interesting.
For facial art, perhaps a point system similar to fingerprint matching could be used to more objectively determine artificiality. How many facial features, are they spacially sensible, do they have the right shape themselves, is the overall shape reasonable? Excuse my engineering rigidity.
Gregg Wilson
Neil
[/quote]
Since Mars has about 1/3 gravity of Earth, 300 meters width is not unreasonable. Our large ships can be 100 meters wide (aircraft carriers, oil tankers). However, very long term, Mars would have been a dessicated moon like our Moon. Perhaps an EPH downloaded a very large amount of water. Given the current topography, Mars would be 1/2 land (southern hemisphere) and 1/2 ocean (northern hemisphere). Would have been very interesting.
For facial art, perhaps a point system similar to fingerprint matching could be used to more objectively determine artificiality. How many facial features, are they spacially sensible, do they have the right shape themselves, is the overall shape reasonable? Excuse my engineering rigidity.
Gregg Wilson
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 years 4 months ago #8934
by emanuel
Replied by emanuel on topic Reply from Emanuel Sferios
Neil,
Thanks for responding. I look forward to seeing the keys next to their originals. As for where I found my "woman facing left" image, it is from strip #S0100652. Sorry I forgot you had asked that question.
Emanuel
Thanks for responding. I look forward to seeing the keys next to their originals. As for where I found my "woman facing left" image, it is from strip #S0100652. Sorry I forgot you had asked that question.
Emanuel
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.282 seconds