- Thank you received: 0
My pareidolia knows no bounds.
10 years 1 week ago #22546
by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
Malcolm, are you reading every message? (I used to say the same thing to Neil, constantly..."damn Neil, you have to read ALL the messages, not just the last one.") lol
You might give it a try. I already gave you an assignment.
rd
You might give it a try. I already gave you an assignment.
rd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
10 years 1 week ago #22756
by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
Malcolm, one other point.
It's not what YOU think of the previous "finds" that matters. <b><i>IT'S WHAT THEY THOUGHT THEY WERE SEEING!</i></b>
rd
It's not what YOU think of the previous "finds" that matters. <b><i>IT'S WHAT THEY THOUGHT THEY WERE SEEING!</i></b>
rd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
10 years 1 week ago #23360
by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Marsevidence01</i>
<br />I really hope you do...I just can't wait to bring the big guns out!
Malcolm Scott
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">And again, you are missing the point. We thought all the previous images were pareidolia also, so we have nothing to defend. But the point is <b><i>the people who were posting them, thought they were the cat's meow JUST LIKE YOU DO. </i></b>
rd
<br />I really hope you do...I just can't wait to bring the big guns out!
Malcolm Scott
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">And again, you are missing the point. We thought all the previous images were pareidolia also, so we have nothing to defend. But the point is <b><i>the people who were posting them, thought they were the cat's meow JUST LIKE YOU DO. </i></b>
rd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Larry Burford
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
10 years 1 week ago #23316
by Larry Burford
Replied by Larry Burford on topic Reply from Larry Burford
<b>[Marsevidence01] "Larry, It does seem to me, I am constantly being put on the defensive."</b>
We know that. You whine about it all the time, so how can we not.
<u>But you are wrong.</u>
We are making fun of your message, not of you. I am being a good bit more blunt this time. Saying it without such emphasis has turned out to be ineffective.
Give us a different message. Please. We want you, or any of the others out there looking for real evidence, to succeed.
Give us a message that does not make us yawn. Because if you do not we will yawn. Do that enough times and we will move from yawing to laughing. Remember we are not yawning or laughing at you - but at your wimpy evidence.
***
Once again - we are sure that someday someone like you (or perhaps you) will in fact find what everyone is looking for.
Remember Nixon's definition of pornography?
None of us can say what it will be. But a lot of us will recognize it almost as soon as we see it.
We know that. You whine about it all the time, so how can we not.
<u>But you are wrong.</u>
We are making fun of your message, not of you. I am being a good bit more blunt this time. Saying it without such emphasis has turned out to be ineffective.
Give us a different message. Please. We want you, or any of the others out there looking for real evidence, to succeed.
Give us a message that does not make us yawn. Because if you do not we will yawn. Do that enough times and we will move from yawing to laughing. Remember we are not yawning or laughing at you - but at your wimpy evidence.
***
Once again - we are sure that someday someone like you (or perhaps you) will in fact find what everyone is looking for.
Remember Nixon's definition of pornography?
None of us can say what it will be. But a lot of us will recognize it almost as soon as we see it.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Marsevidence01
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
10 years 1 week ago #23317
by Marsevidence01
Replied by Marsevidence01 on topic Reply from Malcolm Scott
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rderosa</i>
<br />Malcolm, are you reading every message? (I used to say the same thing to Neil, constantly..."damn Neil, you have to read ALL the messages, not just the last one.") lol
You might give it a try. I already gave you an assignment.
rd
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Yes, in between bring the groceries in and writing a new post....you posted...oh boy, what can I do...my head is spinnin!
Malcolm Scott
<br />Malcolm, are you reading every message? (I used to say the same thing to Neil, constantly..."damn Neil, you have to read ALL the messages, not just the last one.") lol
You might give it a try. I already gave you an assignment.
rd
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Yes, in between bring the groceries in and writing a new post....you posted...oh boy, what can I do...my head is spinnin!
Malcolm Scott
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Marsevidence01
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
10 years 1 week ago #22547
by Marsevidence01
Replied by Marsevidence01 on topic Reply from Malcolm Scott
but at your wimpy evidence.
LB[/quote]
Oh Larry...you're such a brute!
Malcolm Scott
LB[/quote]
Oh Larry...you're such a brute!
Malcolm Scott
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.821 seconds