- Thank you received: 0
My pareidolia knows no bounds.
- Larry Burford
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
10 years 10 months ago #24221
by Larry Burford
Replied by Larry Burford on topic Reply from Larry Burford
<b>[rderosa] "... were playing in the realm of Fred's yin/yang.</b>
You mean as in deliberately playing with the participants ... with mirth aforethought?
You mean as in deliberately playing with the participants ... with mirth aforethought?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
10 years 10 months ago #24222
by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>
<br /><b>[rderosa] "The patterns are real, and we see them, ..."</b>
Real? Yes, tentatively. ...
With no <u>physical</u> pattern to serve as a 'nucleation site' for the perceived image, I'm inclined to say that we are now dealing with a psychological phenomenon. Like a hallucination. But I get your inference, in that "original" probably saw pareidolia as <s>nothing</s> little more than hallucination.
***
The lack of a physical pattern is NOT synonymous with the lack of a real pattern.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
1. Tentatively? In most cases I would say yes, they are real.
2. They called them "partial hallucinations", so again, there's some grey area here. I can almost understand why Zip Monster wanted to resurrect this definition. (Zip, are you there?)
3. I don't understand. And what's DRP?
rd
<br /><b>[rderosa] "The patterns are real, and we see them, ..."</b>
Real? Yes, tentatively. ...
With no <u>physical</u> pattern to serve as a 'nucleation site' for the perceived image, I'm inclined to say that we are now dealing with a psychological phenomenon. Like a hallucination. But I get your inference, in that "original" probably saw pareidolia as <s>nothing</s> little more than hallucination.
***
The lack of a physical pattern is NOT synonymous with the lack of a real pattern.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
1. Tentatively? In most cases I would say yes, they are real.
2. They called them "partial hallucinations", so again, there's some grey area here. I can almost understand why Zip Monster wanted to resurrect this definition. (Zip, are you there?)
3. I don't understand. And what's DRP?
rd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
10 years 10 months ago #15136
by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>
<br />
You mean as in deliberately playing with the participants ... with mirth aforethought?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
From same reference, I mean Def. 6:
play (pl)
v. played, playing, plays
v.intr.
1. To occupy oneself in amusement, sport, or other recreation: children playing with toys.
2.
a. To take part in a game: No minors are eligible to play.
b. To participate in betting; gamble.
3. To act in jest or sport: They're not arguing in earnest, they're just playing.
4. To deal or behave carelessly or indifferently; toy. See Synonyms at flirt.
5. To behave or converse sportively or playfully.
6. To act or conduct oneself in a specified way: play fair; an investor who plays cautiously.
7. To act, especially in a dramatic production.
rd
<br />
You mean as in deliberately playing with the participants ... with mirth aforethought?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
From same reference, I mean Def. 6:
play (pl)
v. played, playing, plays
v.intr.
1. To occupy oneself in amusement, sport, or other recreation: children playing with toys.
2.
a. To take part in a game: No minors are eligible to play.
b. To participate in betting; gamble.
3. To act in jest or sport: They're not arguing in earnest, they're just playing.
4. To deal or behave carelessly or indifferently; toy. See Synonyms at flirt.
5. To behave or converse sportively or playfully.
6. To act or conduct oneself in a specified way: play fair; an investor who plays cautiously.
7. To act, especially in a dramatic production.
rd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
10 years 10 months ago #21777
by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by pareidoliac</i>
<br />
--- but i feel PATTERN RECOGNITION. Is the most simple and least able to be argued against definition.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
I'm convinced you're correct. We are talking about recognizing patterns, and all that follows from that, and all that is implied by that.
rd
<br />
--- but i feel PATTERN RECOGNITION. Is the most simple and least able to be argued against definition.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
I'm convinced you're correct. We are talking about recognizing patterns, and all that follows from that, and all that is implied by that.
rd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pareidoliac
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
10 years 10 months ago #15137
by pareidoliac
Replied by pareidoliac on topic Reply from fred ressler
We see what is on our mind. There is no separation between us and the universe. We dream night and day.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Larry Burford
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
10 years 10 months ago #21778
by Larry Burford
Replied by Larry Burford on topic Reply from Larry Burford
DRP = Deep Reality Physics. It is a name invented by Tom several years before his death to label what his Meta Model was evolving into.
It is a pun on the claim by adherents of the Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Physics that "there is no deep reality" to the universe.
He was never much of a marketing type, but I have always thought that this is a brilliant marketing piece.
It is a pun on the claim by adherents of the Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Physics that "there is no deep reality" to the universe.
He was never much of a marketing type, but I have always thought that this is a brilliant marketing piece.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.340 seconds