string theory - complete nonsense?

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Jim</i>
<br />Adding + and - to the xyz graph results in eight images where one image was in the original graph. How does that resolve the rotional problem that exists in theories about galaxies by generation of dark matter? If you do the math right there isn't a rotional problem in my opinion. The disk has mass not centered but assembled throughout the structure so the gravity of the disk is not centered either.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

The Rotational Problem is resolved if you have an opposite directional disk that provides an opposing force creating circulation of higher dimensional energies such as gravity around both lobes of a symmetric positive and negative Universe. Big bang did not happen. Otherwise Universe would not be as flat and sub rotational mass dispersed evenly as it is now.

John

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rebrady</i>
<br />It is possible that strings are there. Some kind of energy is.

I built a Big Bang Simulator which, as it turns out, points toward many of the ideas of Le Sage. Of note, the experiment supports the idea that:
“Random matter in a random energy field will self organize.”

The simulator shows that all the attributes of gravity are naturally created.

It also suggests that a phase for the universe after expansion could occur whereby all matter disassociates because of the loss of gravity.

I have placed a setup file and a paper on my website at www.eskimo.com/~rebrady/bbang.msi
If you have any trouble downloading the file or opening it, please let me know. Also I would like your comments if you have any.

Robert E. Brady
Sammamish, Washington


<font face="Arial"></font id="Arial">[8D]<div align="left"></div id="left">
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

I use to live in Seattle area. Welcome! You are correct that the energy circulation of Gravity which travels faster then the speed of light would disassociate from Mass if a dynamo did not exist creating the glue that holds Universe together. The problem with existing big bang theories are that we live in a singular universe where Matter dominates and this is impossible. There is an Antimatter Universe that provides the return flow of Gravitational Glue that holds together the flow of time in forward and reverse direction. We still have a very primitive notion of how the Universe operates.

John

John, For that matter the problem of galatic rotation is resolved if you place a blackhole at the center and add all the mass you need to make it work according to the rules you want. I'm sure anyone can come up with something that would work if only this, that or the other.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Jim</i>
<br />Adding + and - to the xyz graph results in eight images where one image was in the original graph. How does that resolve the rotional problem that exists in theories about galaxies by generation of dark matter? If you do the math right there isn't a rotional problem in my opinion. The disk has mass not centered but assembled throughout the structure so the gravity of the disk is not centered either.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Jim, Great points about disk mass not centered so that Gravity is not centered either. The speed of rotation and the expansion of Universe exceeds the expected rates as per the energy states that are calculated to exist. Here is a short quote about Dark Matter:

"Astronomers have in recent years learned that the universe is not just expanding, but is doing so at an ever-increasing pace. This can't be explained given the known matter and energy that exists. To account for the acceleration, theorists have conjured a product they call dark energy, which supposedly repels things rather than attracting, as gravity does."

www.space.com/scienceastronomy/astronomy...universe_020425.html

However, I have an alternate theory that proposes a balanced Universe that is held together from a twin binary circulation around a Matter and Antimatter Universe. My ideas slowly formed from my readings about how Dirac discovered that Antimatter might exist in Universe back approximately in 1925. When I saw that Dirac theory had positive and negative numbers that both itinerated to infinity I beheld a revelation that to this day blew my mind. What I realized was that Time did not exist in early stages of Universe. That for Time to exist Universe had to separate and go in positive and negative directions. That early Universe must be at extreme frequencies that were hyperdimensional and since plasmas were the most primitive known state of energy I began to study plasmas. What I found out was that plasmas become ionized and seperate into cascade dynamics that can become organized. This cascade phenomenon intrigued me, and was a clue to how maybe a higher dimensiona might become a lower frequency and seperate into a rotational twin of Matter and Antimatter symmetry. When looking at Antimatter assymetry in the Matter Universe, and the fact that when atoms are split you can create particle waves that spin in separate directions and the CPT value was shorter for the Antimatter waves. What I realized then was that Antimatter did not belong on this side of Universe and was quickly departing because its spin dynamic was out of sink and produced many opposite effects. That said other questions arised such as non locality and laws of super resonance that began to take on a picture very different from what we have been told about how energy organizes itself within the limits of a Einstien Relativity where nothing can exceed the C speed limit. I am still on the quest and now I am trying to visualize how this duality might appear in a model format. What is interesting is that there does appear to be an evolution in thought taking place that I think will bring about some amazing changes in how we perceive the Universe is organized.

John

The AC current math is done with negative numbers somewhat like what you are working on. Maybe you have training in that field? Or if not you might be interested in the math of AC.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by mhelland</i>
<br />That position really misses the point of dimensions.

Pun ony slightly intended. What you're talking about is an extremely naive idea about dimensions.

mhelland@techmocracy.net
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Pardon my naïveté, if you would be so kind as to enlighten me - possibly beginning with a cogent definition of the term.