Big Bang letter in New Scientist

Seen it now, so true, so true....how sad and tragic....Cosmology could be moving forward at a much faster rate. Oh well, we do have Tom's site, and although he certainly does not accept everything we suggest he always listens, and for that I thank him. He also has never refered to anyone that I am aware of as a crackpot (even though in my case he may think it...lol). For this he deserves much credit and admiration.

Thanks Tom for the Outlet. I do appreciate it.

Johnny

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by mhelland</i>
<br />Just wondering if ya'll saw this:
www.cosmologystatement.org/

mhelland@techmocracy.net
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

I have red this open letter and its critical viewpoints suits perfect too my own critics, but that are solved by the theory I have derived from experiments.

Have a preview at the Unified Theory of Physics by my abstract from the conference at AAAS in Denver 10 April 2004: www.theuniphysics.info


This was my fifth conference after NPA Storrs 2000, TH2002 UNESCO
Paris, St-Petersburg 2002, Kazan 2003 (plenary lecture).

My latest insight is that my entropy-displacement discovery also explains the Pioneer spacecraft's misinterpreted acceleration anomaly. My explanation is physical and mathematical understandable and controllable.

Later I will present the whole paper and I will tell you when.

Ingvar Astrand, Sweden

Another guy from Sweden, we are taking over!

I reed the info document you posted Ingvar and I got to say you seem to have made some discoveries. That thing about plants seemed very strange so I’m eager to get some more facts about it.