Quantized redshift anomaly

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Joe Keller</i>
If the "Pioneer deceleration" force, 8*10^(-8)dyne/gram, acts like friction to cause the heat output, then Jupiter's heat output is about 100x (137x?) too low.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Do not loose your time with the "anomalous accelerations" of the Pioneer probes. The blueshift of their radio emissions is produced by a CREIL transfer of energy from the sunlight to the radio (increase of entropy of the set of EM waves). This transfer of energy is allowed by the cooling of the solar wind beyond 5 UA, which generates metastable 2S neutral atomic hydrogen; this hydrogen works as a catalyst to allow the increase of entropy.

What I am looking for is anomalous energy. And what I mean by that is simply more energy than supposed sourced from yet unknowns? And if you refer to the temperatures of the planets, that they are hotter than supposed, could this be because of plasma interactions? What I need is new energy. Literally energy from nothing, knowing of course that nothing is really something, Else...Well, why not, let's just assume that there is an energy source, do we find evidence of activities showing this?

tm

And I can ask the same questions in our own solar system, the Sun. THe Cronosphere amomaly, hot from cold, in terms of plasma, keeping in mind Thomas's explanation of photosphere being the cold one, to me looks exactly like the ignition system of old cars. The solar flare is actually a plasma flow. But it is more than that it is electrical plasma flow, and electric current. In the ignition system, the current is sent through a coil and the coil creates magnetic lines of force. When the points open, the elctrical current stops leaving the magnetic field suspended in midair so to speak whereupon it collaspes, cutting throught the coils of wire creating a new current flow open circuit or not. A spark happens.

They say the surface of the sun is like billions and billions of these mini solar flares.

So I am wondering the the electric current plasma flow can participate in the creation of extra energy. A little bit is all we need.

They say it can be done in the basement....

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Tommy</i>
<br />And I can ask the same questions in our own solar system, the Sun. THe Cronosphere amomaly, hot from cold, in terms of plasma, keeping in mind Thomas's explanation of photosphere being the cold one, to me looks exactly like the ignition system of old cars.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
The problem is very complicated. A partial explanation may be the absorption of far UV light emitted deep by very excited atoms. This light is not much absorbed by the protons, the electrons and neutral atoms, so that it reaches easily the photosphere in which H- atoms absorb much, and reemit light.
Remaining far UV light may be Rayleigh diffracted in the chromosphere, and absorbed by it, heating it.

“... Lorentz, in order to justify his transformation equations, saw the necessity of postulating a physical effect of interaction between moving matter and æther, to give the mathematics meaning. Physics still had de jure authority over mathematics: it was Einstein, who had no qualms about abolishing the æther and still retaining light waves whose properties were expressed by formulae that were meaningless without it, who was the first to discard physics altogether and propose a wholly mathematical theory...” Herbert Dingle, Science at the Cross-Roads.

“... Lorentz, in order to justify his transformation equations, saw the necessity of postulating a physical effect of interaction between moving matter and æther, to give the mathematics meaning. Physics still had de jure authority over mathematics: it was Einstein, who had no qualms about abolishing the æther and still retaining light waves whose properties were expressed by formulae that were meaningless without it, who was the first to discard physics altogether and propose a wholly mathematical theory...” Herbert Dingle, Science at the Cross-Roads.