Creation of the Big Bang!

I see ZERO as the measure of Nothingeness and not as the lowest possible form of existence. I perceive Nothingness as a possible dynamic state and ZERO is its measure.

No physical process can go to absolute ZERO but can only approach it asymptoticaly (or oscillate between 0- and 0+) or (-e and +e) or whatever, which is defined as a number smaller than the smallest possible number S.

<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=2 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>

God could not have created “EVIL” because the good God only does “GOOD”.

<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>

In Theology, the above is an important argument made (if I recall correctly) by Saint Anselm of Canterbury. It is only a logical inference to proce that God cannot be all powerfull and all Good at the same time, but it cannot disprove His Existence. If you were not aware of it, I congradulate you for developing it yourself. Christian religion stambles in the face of that argument.

In this post and as part of my hypothesis "ZERO" is not nothingness, just the lowest form of existence. Both the entity "ZERO" and the number (0) exist therefor they cannot be "Nothingness". Explaination is in the next quote.

[\quote]


I agree with the second part of your sentense, that ZERO and (0) exist and cannot be Nothigness. But you generate a contradiction:

If everything was made from ZERO, then ZERO must be the highest form of existence and not the lowest, by definition. Then, the cosmic totality should equal to ZERO, if preservation of energy is accepted. Then, each of us is a subdivision of ZERO. Therefore, in this chain of thought, ZERO and EVERYTHING is exactly the same thing.

1/0 = infinity and 1/infinity = 0 or put it another way

Something/nothingness=everything and Something/everything = nothingness or

Nothingness X Everything = Something

in words:

Nothingness UNITES with EVerything and FORM Something(s)

This simple transfer function is your creation mechanism. A process of partition and of subdidivision. The real question is who or what pulled the trigger?<img src=icon_smile.gif border=0 align=middle>

quote:
___________________________________________________________________________
ZEROEis the tiniest of all the constituents and all the other constituents contain ZEROE
___________________________________________________________________________

I thought "Zero" was the lack of constituents.

quote:
___________________________________________________________________________
It is only a logical inference to proce [sic] that God cannot be all powerfull and all Good at the same time, but it cannot ***disprove His Existence***. If you were not aware of it, I congradulate [sic] you for developing it yourself.
___________________________________________________________________________

Friends, watch your spelling.

This is theologically underdeveloped. The full articulation should say that God cannot be all powerful and all harmonious at the same time. With that, I disagree.

Sorry, could you explain again why "Zero" exists?

Our scientific traditions rely on the Aristotelian foundation that that "nothing can be, and not be, at the same time."

You would have to produce an experiment that did not use logic.

That is why I previously suggested the end of this forum.

Just a clarification.

Something is an entity.

"Nothing" is a non-entity. Agreed?

Aristotle did not have any misconceptions when he proposed that "Nothing can exist, and not exist, at the same time."

In the above, "Nothing" is not an entity.

To further clarify,

In the "Zero" theory, zero is not nothing? In MM "zero" is an asymtote... correct? It serves the same purpose as any other asymptote, then (ie. infinity),

We've been here before.

Okay, a theory is verified by experiement. Any experiments out there?