- Thank you received: 0
Expansion vs. Rescaling
19 years 1 week ago #12916
by Jim
Reply from was created by Jim
That is the thing about models-you can make them any way you want to. They have a meaning all their own and if no one understands them its ok too.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- john hunter
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
19 years 1 week ago #12917
by john hunter
Replied by john hunter on topic Reply from john hunter
Dear Jim,
This model is easy to understand if you take about 10 minutes to read about it - and may be the one that is needed to resolve some of the problems faced by standard General Relativity.
It gives a very natural solution of the flatness problem , and avoids problems of singularities by 'G' reducing for dense masses. This reduction of G also comes very naturally from simple first principles.
John Hunter.
This model is easy to understand if you take about 10 minutes to read about it - and may be the one that is needed to resolve some of the problems faced by standard General Relativity.
It gives a very natural solution of the flatness problem , and avoids problems of singularities by 'G' reducing for dense masses. This reduction of G also comes very naturally from simple first principles.
John Hunter.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 years 1 week ago #12920
by Jim
Replied by Jim on topic Reply from
I'm quite sure it is easy for you to understand the model you are touting here. For me, I don't understand it at all.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.344 seconds