Dark matter and black holes

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Tom - When I have time, I plan a complete rethink of large scale forces from first principles<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Does this imply that there may be 'other' forces at work at these large scales? If the MM holds true then the same should apply to the other end of the scale - extremely small scales where there might also be forces that we currently don't know or understand.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Rudolf</i>
<br />Does this imply that there may be 'other' forces at work at these large scales?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Yes, but I was referring to the known medium "elysium". Its constituent elysons are much larger than gravitons. Yet the role of elysium has not yet been considered in galactic dynamics.

We should develop all we can with the known mediums before we start thinking about unknown ones. -|Tom|-

We will meet in another thread that black holes have much what black matter hasn't.

We arrive at black matter as... where is it. It must exist. As a state of matter. Not that we see too less gravity mass.

We are coming there with our helping tool fractality, that is not an axiom, but an open tool. Much more useful than a fixed axiom. It's dynamical.

Can you guess what our idea of Dark Matter is?

We don't need matter and anti-matter or Elysium. Higg's ideas are still only theory.

But do you like to make a try?

Ed van der Meulen