- Thank you received: 0
To disprove GR
- MarkVitrone
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
21 years 11 months ago #3637
by MarkVitrone
Replied by MarkVitrone on topic Reply from Mark Vitrone
photo electric effect = yes
relativity = no
<img src=icon_smile.gif border=0 align=middle>
Mark Vitrone
relativity = no
<img src=icon_smile.gif border=0 align=middle>
Mark Vitrone
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Quantum_Gravity
- Offline
- Premium Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
21 years 11 months ago #3781
by Quantum_Gravity
Replied by Quantum_Gravity on topic Reply from Randall damron
the photo eletric effect has to do with light, metals, and electricity? if so then what would the maximum light wave length be? maybe we can resolve that, that would be good to get information on from the rest of you<img src=icon_smile_shy.gif border=0 align=middle>
The intuitive mind
The intuitive mind
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- MarkVitrone
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
21 years 11 months ago #3588
by MarkVitrone
Replied by MarkVitrone on topic Reply from Mark Vitrone
The photoelectric effect is the father of spectroscopy. Each element and compound bears a specific and unique spectrograph based on the effect that occurs when an energetic electron bombards an atom causing its electrons to jump to an excited state, when those electrons fall they release a specific quanta (hate this term cause it implies a particle) of light.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.401 seconds