- Thank you received: 0
C Squared
- Larry Burford
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
20 years 4 months ago #10066
by Larry Burford
Replied by Larry Burford on topic Reply from Larry Burford
Oh. OK.
Well, let us know what you find out.
LB
Well, let us know what you find out.
LB
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Larry Burford
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
20 years 4 months ago #10012
by Larry Burford
Replied by Larry Burford on topic Reply from Larry Burford
PS - You know, Jim, I've never understood what your point is. Still don't. I'm sure there are plenty of problems where f = ma gets you to a better answer with less effort than E = mc^2. So what?
But my point is, if you are going to come to this message board and state a conclusion (for example, "f = ma is more useful than E = mc^2") over and over, we are going to expect you to be able to say *why*.
Sooner or later.
But my point is, if you are going to come to this message board and state a conclusion (for example, "f = ma is more useful than E = mc^2") over and over, we are going to expect you to be able to say *why*.
Sooner or later.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Larry Burford
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
20 years 4 months ago #10257
by Larry Burford
Replied by Larry Burford on topic Reply from Larry Burford
PPS - In a way it seems like you are actually asking the question "Can f = ma be more useful than E = mc^2?"
If so, the answer is "For some problems, yes."
If so, the answer is "For some problems, yes."
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
20 years 4 months ago #10013
by Jim
Replied by Jim on topic Reply from
LB, My point is that c^2 is not an absolute number as is and has been the asumption. Everything is forced to fit that and therefore is distorted to suit-everything.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
20 years 4 months ago #10014
by GD
Replied by GD on topic Reply from
[Larry] -Yeah, I know what you mean. If only we had some other equations to play with. Perhaps one of them would be able to explain particle paths or conservation of momentum.-
Larry,
Do you mean a particle spiralling to a stop is conservation of momentum ?
Do you mean the spiral of stars towards the center of a galaxy as conservation of momentum ?
Or do you mean the degeneracy over time of the atoms in our own bodies ?
The fact that you have so many equations to play with, does this mean they are correct? Or is this preventing you from getting the right picture?
I do not take for granted what is being taught in schools.
Larry,
Do you mean a particle spiralling to a stop is conservation of momentum ?
Do you mean the spiral of stars towards the center of a galaxy as conservation of momentum ?
Or do you mean the degeneracy over time of the atoms in our own bodies ?
The fact that you have so many equations to play with, does this mean they are correct? Or is this preventing you from getting the right picture?
I do not take for granted what is being taught in schools.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Larry Burford
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
20 years 4 months ago #10015
by Larry Burford
Replied by Larry Burford on topic Reply from Larry Burford
GD,
I can't help it. Sometimes it just jumps out and gets all over me. Spiral galaxy.
LB
I can't help it. Sometimes it just jumps out and gets all over me. Spiral galaxy.
LB
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.315 seconds